It’s funny that neither works.

  • Shoop@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Lol except muskrat is a fake free speech absolutionist and will happily censor what he doesn’t agree with

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Zuck would just be contemplating the data harvesting. He’s not really pro censorship, so long as the hateful stuff is buried in private fb communities. He couldn’t be bothered to turn off aspects of his site regarding the Rohingya.

      And I dont want to give off the wrong impression about my stance on censorship, but if you’re curating social media content via a algorithm, you have more responsibility regarding the consequences then someone who’s just providing hosting.

  • sulungskwa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I dont know, doesn’t like, blocking the entire site to people without twitter accounts count as censorship?

  • Kalkaline @lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    What if we just let people run their own servers and allow what they want within the limits of the law and let them share that with who they want?