End of an era: Zoom tells employees to return to office for work::Zoom is asking all of its employees to return to the office for the first time since the COVID-19 pandemic began, when the tech company blew up as one of the main means of communication when people were forced to work from home.

  • jeffw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m a simple man… I see “NY Post,” I click the downvote button.

    • King@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      2 years ago

      Simple mind indeed, dont bother reading and analyzing the contents, just give up

      • NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        If it’s actually newsworthy, the same content is available elsewhere.

        The NY Post is garbage.

  • JonnyJ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Get this shitty rag out of here. NYPost is fucking propaganda spreading filth

    • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 years ago

      Calling it “end of an era” as if remote work is over, no matter how interest remains among workers and companies still offer it, is definitely a propaganda move.

  • MicTEST@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Pretty bad optics when your company depends on enabling collaboration in virtual settings.

      • Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I never understood this tactic. Why demoralize your whole workforce for months until enough motivated and talented people leave that you don’t have to fire anyone. The useless ones are never the first ones to leave, especially if they don’t have any talents to sell to other companies. Also people don’t leave immediately after it turns bad, it usually takes months for them to be demoralized enough and find new arrangements.

        By that time wouldn’t it be smarter to eat the cost of firing people from the start, get rid of the fat, pay the severance and move on with those that can still lead you to success? I’m convinced the moral hit would be a lot less this way and the bounce back would be faster.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          It makes the short term numbers look good. They just want to produce a spreadsheet that tells Wall Street that they cut $x million in labour costs, and don’t really care how that affects the long term health of the company.

          Besides, when a corporation becomes a certain size, they don’t invest in innovation any more, they just buy a start-up that did something innovative, integrate it into their existing product and then repeat the cycle.

          Capitalism is trending more and more into short term thinking, because Wall Street realised that capital can be moved at the press of a button. When a corporation is sucked dry, you load it with debt, sell your stock to retail investors, pension funds and/or the government and move on to the next opportunity.