i dont like that…

    • LightDelaBlue@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      its not for nothing i got 2 phone my main at home work ect and the one for… hum “funny party at paris” sadly they dont care anymore. the left protest? ITS TERRORISME! the eco protest? its ECO-TERO blabla

  • LeadSoldier@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 years ago

    Funny! In America it is against our constitution but we allow the NSA to do it because when we protest we get killed, arrested or our lives ruined.

    I protested the illegal separation and detention of children at the border. It was literal torture. The government later found that their own actions were illegal. In the meantime, I was arrested and beaten and on bail conditions for over 6 months before being found not guilty. The officers who beat me were given immunity. They decided not to keep the tapes at the facility after we requested they keep them because of the assault.

    I am a disabled veteran and was a career federal employee.

    This is America.

  • massacre@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    This is terrifying enough of a privacy invasion at the nation-state level. It’s catastrophic to give police this authority and capability. If this comes to the U.S., we are fucking doomed.

    • LightDelaBlue@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      its already the case in the US. you internet provoder watch every of your step. just try download a torrent.

      • massacre@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yes, our internet providers and mobile providers are in bed with the NSA, CIA, FBI, DOD, NIS and probably many other 3 letter agencies. But those aren’t the almost wholly unregulated Police of america staffed by literal gang-members in some jurisdictions. At least today that data is (ostensibly) behind a warrant.

  • Synapse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    The only way to defend against that is to be extremely mindful of what apps you install. The police will need a backdoor to activate the spybug, this will come in the form of an app that a large amount of people install willingly and are relying on.

    In China the police can get immediate and total access to any citizens’ phone my simply scanning an ID (driver license, etc). This is probably a feature built into WeChat or another app that all Chinese people are relying on.

  • Firipu@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Maybe a dumb question, but how the hell would they access my camera/geolocation etc? On e.g. a stock pixel device, would the french police have an actual backdoor through google? Or would it be through compromised shitty apps (like the chat app that was being used by criminals a while back, which was actually made by the police)?

  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    During a debate on Wednesday, MPs in President Emmanuel Macron’s camp inserted an amendment limiting the use of remote spying to “when justified by the nature and seriousness of the crime” and “for a strictly proportional duration.”

    Are “nature and seriousness” defined in an objective or concrete way? And for a proportional duration to what?