• tquid@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s as if, like, if you are a woman, and also in a disfavoured racial category, like, where they, uh, have overlap? Where they meet? It’s not the same as either one individually but its own, I guess nexus? I feel like there’s a better word for this

        • 001100 010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I think it’s called a “double minority”, but being a woman isn’t really a minority tho (edit: not a minority in the context of being 50% of the human population) so I don’t know if theres a better term than that.

          I feel bad for people who are black, lesbian, neurodivergent, and trans-woman… like that’s a quadruple minority.

          • ReiRose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            That’s not what minority means in the sociological context. Volume is mathematical. Poor people are a minority and there’s more of them than the 1%. Being a minority is about lack of power, prestige and property. And intersectionality is the more formal term, but ‘double minority’ gets the point across.

        • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          @ReiRose@lemmy.world has it right, the term and idea is intersectionality.

          apropos of nothing, intersectionality came out of critical race theory’s analyses of black womens outcomes in the legal system. the particular combination of oppression is literally the textbook example.

    • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      This is also common in the guitar community. Some women can shred like mofos, and here comes Jim-Bob McGraw saying their playing is tracked etc., ad nauseum

    • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The funny thing is that in my experience female programmers usually have above average skills. I suspect it’s exactly because of this bias against women in tech. Where an average or below average dude can easily get by, this is much harder for women. As a result this bias acts as a kind of filter which results in female programmers being on average a little better than male programmers because all the average or below average ones get filtered out early.

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Even more rage inducing these comments would be the same if she wasn’t conventionally attractive.

      Fucking programmers need a solid clip around the ear.

  • VanillaGorilla@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    I was so glad we had a woman join our dev team some months ago. It’s more fun, more relaxed and we are able to get better results as we just cover a wider area of skills. People gatekeeping programming to include only men are idiots.

    • girltwink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      That poor girl. My gf’s only female teammate quit last month and i suggested she start grinding leetcode asap. Could you imagine being the only woman on a team? Pretty strong indicator that something is very wrong there.

      • JDubbleu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Eh, my team is this way, but it’s because we’re aerospace adjacent which further compounds the problem. The only woman on our team is awesome and everyone gets along great. No one has an inflated ego or feels the need to one up each other though, which tends to be the root of the issue in my experience. Lots of tech bros feel the need to put others down, and see women as an easier target unfortunately.

  • Cubes@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Tbf, the original photo was already discounting her abilities. Saying “can program code” for a lead SWE is saying like “can do calculus” for a physicist.

    • odium@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      In their defense, maybe the post was written by some journalist with no technical background at all and doesn’t know the difference.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Also, once you’re moderately good at programming, language doesn’t matter much. You can pick up a new high level language relatively easily if needed. Low level languages might be harder for some people though, because it takes a fairly different mindset. Personally, I love low level programming, though it’s not very time efficient to write.

      • Square Singer@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah, once you’ve got a few languages under your belt, it’s all about concepts. If you end up learning a new language that follows completely different paradigms, you are back to square one. But most of the time you can go like “Ah, so concept X of the new language works similar to concept Y of that language I already know.”

      • riodoro1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Nope, not really.

        Ain’t to many shitposts on stackoverflow and the raywenderlich website is one of the best ios programming resources. This shit is respectable.

      • kicksystem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        27k points on SO is respectable. I’ve got 20k and that wasn’t easy. There are shortcuts, but to find those you’ve also got to be clever.

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s annoying sometimes that people just assume that those who don’t work in tech are completely clueless about tech.

    It’s also really funny to mess with people who assumes that.

  • 2ez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Some fragile male egos in this thread. Looking forward to your complaints about the Barbie movie. Sad and pathetic.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I don’t know what you’re talking about. For me the fragile egos are way down the thread, all massively downvoted. The absolute majority is supportive.

  • ApeCavalry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Whenever I see someone taking down these absolute bottom of the barrel incel dork on social media, it just feels like shoo-ing a squirrel off the bird feeder. Just not even worth taking action

  • solstice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Am I the only one that doesn’t think it’s a waste if a gorgeous person does modeling/acting? If I had a body people wanted to ogle I would be using that power 24/7 instead of sitting here in a shitty office under fluorescent lights pretending to care about work while they pretend to care about me.

  • Kinglink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I’m sure she’s a programmer. But she’s a programmer who drops her Stack Overflow score… let’s just say that’s a red flag in my book. (For all programmers).

    For non programmers, it’s like someone dropping their reddit karma score, or the number of their subscribers on Youtube as the first thing they say. Basically “my most important accomplishment is some rather unimportant digits”.

    (Views matter far more than subscribers on youtube, mostly because subscribers can easily be manipulated)

  • nefonous@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I don’t understand why people absolutely need to make everything about man vs woman.

    If it was a male model those people would have written exactly the same. If tomorrow comes out an article saying the same thing about bred pitt everyone would be suspicious about that being fake too

    Since the two jobs are so disconnected from each other it sounds unlikely and they assumed it was some clickbait fake post, that’s all.

    I’m absolutely for equality and against any discrimination against women or any other category, but making this into a gender battle is ridiculous

  • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Guess what, if that was some pumped-up muscle-bound male model that was 3/4 naked walking down the runway, people would be saying similar things about him too.

  • Esjee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Itt: people getting upset over joke comments.

    If there was a post about a male model saying the same thing the comments would be exactly the same. Not everything is about gender or race.