Do bluesky advertise itself?
Do bluesky advertise itself?
I don’t know how many not tech savvy people know this, but it helps too.
Could bluesky have won over Mastodon because of the fediverse barrier where people doesn’t know which server to choose?
Maybe it didn’t started for that goal.
Year of linux desktop?
And so do Soviet Union too. /s
Welcome to Web 3 I guess. Automated systems ignoring real actors
I’d just like to interject for a moment. What you’re refering to as KDE, is in fact, KDE Plasma.
Anyway, I use Gnome but if you are used to Plasma, there is no need to make things harder by using Gnome on a device and Plasma on another. Just stick to Plasma.
Is it Debian Sid?
Ehm, it is already like that. Most of smart TVs use Android which is under Google control, a big (if not the biggest) ad company.
Why creating a new distro instead of using a big one and contribute to it?
I bet it is chromium too.
Brave is chromium.
No, use Tenacity instead.
It’s the best example in my opinion, because it is full of fake versions of popular piracy sites because Google hides the originals.
And it is the only site I know ddg shows certification every time.
Ddg already have this for some sites.
what OP is referring to is actually the “distributed” nature of git, where i.e. it’s easy to copy the entire history of an instance.
Exactly. Isn’t decentralized itself since it’s not a platform but by being “indipendent” and not entangled with anything you can just copy it entirely and host it somewhere else.
Yes but no, because I don’t want to not interact with a repo at all just because it’s on github for whatever reason (if there’s one).
But yes, I understand your feelings. Fuck M$
https://ytdlp.online/