• Synthead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s owned by meta, which is notoriously bad with your privacy.

    Saved you a click.

    • Anders429@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 years ago

      Dang, I’m feeling pretty lucky that no one in my life uses WhatsApp. Sounds like that’s not the norm.

      • ProfessorFlaw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        In europe literally everybody uses whatsapp you wont be able to do anything without it (docotrs, food delivery, literally every person like friends and familly, corona test results, company customer support, the list goes on)

        • I am become Noodle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Friends and family, sure But in the UK nothing official is using WhatsApp. It’s all SMS or email. In which countries do companies use WhatsApp for customer support?

      • scottywh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s not nearly as common in the US as it seems to be in many places in Europe.

    • PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      EVERYONE in my backwater country of residence uses WhatsApp and they can’t be bothered to use anything else.

      When I say I don’t have that service then they are stumped and can’t think of a way to message me. Fucking morons.

      Adults in Austria… Sigh.

    • Jujuki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Not only everybody, but companies, banks and goverment instances are using it too. Some apps that sends their OTP via WhatsApp. Some companies and instances only reachable.via whatsapp bot and whatnot.

      • ProfessorFlaw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Thats smth that i forgot, corona test results per whatsapp and a lot of companies also just have a whatsapp kontskt on their “kontakt us” page

    • notenoughbutter@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I even deleted it for a year, but had to re-install it due to not being able to group chat

      I used signal and SMS for people who weren’t on signal

      and even signal removed SMS support so now I use it to talk to 3 people on signal

    • tabular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      For some “everyone” not talking to you is a perk.

      The people I most care for use Discord. I worry I will lose constant with most of them if I stop using that too but I’ve never tried to get other to use something else.

      • KptnAutismus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        in my immediate family (brother and parents) we use signal, but everyone else in my life still uses whatsapp. sadly the zucc has a monopolyomn messaging in europe.

      • ProfessorFlaw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I mean yeah, but i would have no contacts to anyone, here in germany we literally use nothing else, contact to teachers for assignments is lost, couldnt text with my family, would have no contact to my friends etc

        • d3Xt3r@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          But what if you messaged them via SMS, would they refuse to reply back?

          • PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            When I send sms to these folks, they don’t even notice that they got a message. “Oh, you sent sms? I don’t use that.”

          • PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            When I send sms to these folks, they don’t even notice that they got a message. “Oh, you sent sms? I don’t use that.”

  • Mantis_Toboggan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    2 years ago

    As someone from Latin America. FUCK!

    It’s literally what everyone uses for business, family/friends groups. Don’t know if any country around here is an exception, but we started using it because greedy telecoms were charging so much money for SMS at the time. So, it was a great way to circumvent that.

    Then Facebook bought it when it was already established, so it’s improbable that people will move away from it.

    • Screwthehole@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      The article isn’t very, uh, articulate in its reasoning. Nothing here is an actual real life problem it’s all just what-ifs, and 2 billion people aren’t going to quit using it

      • zaph@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        A teen in Nebraska was sentenced to 3 months in jail because Facebook turned over her “private” messages but sure, no real life problems with trusting meta with your “encrypted” messages.

        • grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I do not disagree with your basic premise and I completely disagree with the Nebraska prosecution but I think people need to understand that everything we do online it’s monitored.

          If they can’t get the actual message data, they will use meta data (e.g. two parties sending and receiving data packets that match in size and time of occurrence and protocol and are known to each other) or whatever.

          If you are doing something you are worried about other people knowing about, do not use any digital form of communication. Full stop. There is no privacy online.

          • zaph@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            2 years ago

            You’re absolutely right, there’s no privacy online. But there are significantly better alternatives that offer end to end encryption and sometimes digital communication is required.

            • grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              Yes, I agree, for example credit card transaction processing or business communication with trade secrets in it. For most people doing things they want kept private but which is not illegal, basic encryption is great.

              If I were going to plot the overthrow of a government, I’d try to as much as possible offline.

        • yeather@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          That was Facebook Messenger too, completely different app and problem, not that Whatsapp isnt better or worse.

          • zaph@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 years ago

            I used it as an example because they’re both owned by meta and make similar promises on privacy and encryption.

  • DaveNa@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I would like more clickbait title please, thanks.

  • MyDogLovesMe@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Ungh, my family all uses it. So I’m kind of forced to use it only for one chat as were all far away. I seriously DON’T want it on my phone though.

    • paddytokey@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Told my family and friends I’ll be moving to signal, gave them about 2 months before switching and told everyone if you don’t want to install signal, you can always call or text me. Moved my entire family and all of my friends over. They all use WhatsApp as well but realised that there is no problem with using one more app

  • kylostillreigns@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Despite all of its privacy concerns, one can’t really get rid of it if everyone around is using it as the default communication mode, unless you’re a social outcast. The thing with communication apps is that they aren’t a personal choice.

    • whatever@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      It is possible without beeing a social outcast. Element, Signal, Telegram and Threema cover most of my contacts. If there really is someone with only Whatsapp, I write a SMS.

      In my experience everyone has at least one alternative to Whatsapp.

  • 6mementomori@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Meanwhile literally everyone uses it here. Choose between forfeiting your privacy or isolation. I’ve already left Instagram and that cut me out of a good portion of online interaction here. Leaving whatsapp would eliminate most forms of contact I have with people here. The only thing left is mobile calling, and SMS, which is basically forgotten by everyone. The shit that happens when one platform rules over all.

  • Maharashtra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    And lose the ability to interact with all those people that won’t be convinced to switch to less of a software gore?

    Yeah, definitely great idea, so rebel & stuff…

  • muaveri@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    … & gold endorsement of whatsapp cofounder Brian Acton saying : “I am a sellout. I acknowledge that.” & donating $50M for Signal Foundation