• PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    You’re not wrong, but also give me an example of ANY country that doesn’t resort to authoritarianism when the government is threatened by a plurality of citizens.

    • Tedesche@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      There are plenty of governments out there that aren’t authoritarian. What do you mean when you say “the government is threatened by a plurality of citizens?” What is the nature of the threat in question? A democratically-elected government that puts down an armed rebellion from part of its populace doesn’t magically become authoritarian simply because it used forced to maintain its existence in response to a domestic threat.

      • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        I mean that there is a realistic existential threat placed on the system of government, by a large part of the population. By plurality, I mean that the largest segment of a population (even if it’s not a majority).

        You’re telling me that govt’s that put down a large rebellion don’t then start introducing authoritan laws like monitoring communication, restricting free speech, and targeting non-violent sympathizers?

    • ciko22i3@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      …any democracy? Different governments get voted out of power constantly. A lot of countries elections are almost 50/50