I have an old x86_64 computer which I am planning to use as a NAS. Which of the 2 is a better option? Is it helpful or better to run on bare metal or as a VM on proxmox?

  • TBi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    I run OMV baremetal for last few years. I really like it. I did try TrueNAS and found it too convoluted.

    Nextcloud is a totally different beast that would run on top of either.

    OMV allows you to use ZFS as well if you want (I do) but also the flexibility to use other raid systems.

    I just wish they’d left in portainer as default. No point reinventing the docker wheel…

  • BaldDude@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I verry much like OMV, simply because i could use it with knowledge i already have.

    It is a Debian system -> I understand that

    It uses normal RAID and ext4 -> I understand that (Plus, if things go wrong, I can just pop the drives back into any other computer and use it without much fuss)

    It has a rSnapshot plug in -> I already used that in the past.

    Sure I’m missing out on fancy stuff like BTRFS / ZFS, but i can live with that.

    • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Lvm can get you 80% of the way to basic zfs. I’m a bit similar, old school Unix who likes debian because it makes sense, but storage is one of my dominating constraints so zfs is mandatory (even if I hate stuff like the way the arc works by default).

      • stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        For me just the convenience of having everything in one box. Simplifies networking too. I run home assistant, openwrt, OMV, an ubuntu dtop VM and a wordpress LXC on a little m93 I jacked up with 32Gb RAM. Backups are dead simple and it’s all on one little UPS.

        Some might prefer metal for other reasons but simplicity and convenience are priorities for me, at least in my homelab.

      • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        The rules now are generally: bare metal if that’s all the box will do, or it’s main task, container if it’s one of many services, vm if it’s a larger application you might migrate and i/o isn’t your limitation.

        The line between container and vm is fuzzy, but bare metal means you’re making a design choice for that machine and if that or another application breaks the machine you’re screwed.

        In a way freebsd is amazing for this, you put all applications in jails and don’t use the main userspace much, but the virtualiztion story isn’t quite there yet.

  • nezbyte@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    OMV with SnapRaid+MergerFS in a Proxmox VM. I used an LSI card with PCI passthrough to the VM so it could see the drives. Nightly snapshots of the VMs are very convenient if you ever need to restore/migrate your install.

  • MrGandalf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    I have tried few of them but I highly recommend you to try UNRAID. It will introduce you to world of docker containers