• ziggurism@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m not following. You’d be ok with risking beheading to overthrow a monarch. But you won’t overthrow a corporate CEO?

    You think corporations don’t exist under monarchy?

    • Domille@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      no, I don’t. They have far more complex structures. Just because you remove a CEO, does not mean the whole company will go away. How many CEOs have been fired and replaced? Plenty. These companies still remain though, corrupting everything around them.

      • megasin1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        I will say I’m the UK we still have a king that we couldn’t physically overthrow although we could possibly remove them constitutionally if the democracy aligned in that direction. However we do still have amazon here.

        I think the difference between UK and US for workers rights comes from how we treat lobbying differently.

      • yata@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Yeah, but the point is that corporations still exist and rule in most monarchies at this very moment. You would just be adding an extra layer of something to overthrow.

    • ScrimbloBimblo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I feel like it’s more about distribution of responsibility. If you have a king, he’s either a good king and runs things well, or a bad king and runs things poorly. A King’s success is generally measured by the quality of his kingdom, which is at least somewhat tied to the wellbeing of subjects.

      In a corporation, even if you have a comparitively “good” CEO, he’s still answerable to the shareholders, and thus obligated to raise the stock value by any means necessary, a factor which is not necessarily dependent on the wellbeing of his employees.

  • knotthatone@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 years ago

    What makes you think a monarchy would do anything to combat a corpo hellscape? If history’s any indication, they’d probably make all the CEOs lords and turn everybody else into an indentured peasantry.

  • gundog48@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    A company is much easier to crash than a monarch or government. A government will lock you up or kill you for planning to overthrow them.

  • Sylver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Same way you overthrow a king. Without exaggeration or sarcasm, we can’t really discuss those methods civilly, but history can always repeat itself.

  • bi_tux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    I think a lot of people here have a weird understanding of monarchy and revolutions.

    • kakes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      When the entirety of your experience with monarchies and revolutions is a line in a history textbook, it seems a lot easier and less painful than it is.