• woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Doubtful. Even among the Reiser users, I bet nobody uses a ReiserFS version bundled with the kernel. Reiser4 is has never been upstreamed which is a bit of a shame because technologically it’s apparently quite good. Nobody but the leftover developers know why they did not just rename that thing and adapted it to kernel standards…

  • biscotty666@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was one of the reiserfs users before it happened and I dumped it quickly. I think an awful lot of people did the same, and since it was one of a number of alternatives to ext I think it is more abandonment than obsolescence.

    Now I think my decision was wrong headed, so long as he was no longer involved. The NASA example was given. Alfred Hitchcock movies? Abuser of women but damn good films.

    • vividspecter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      reiser4 was a promising filesystem (had transparent compression very early on) but reiser3 (reiserfs) didn’t really have anything significant over ext3/4 so abandoning it made sense. And reiser4 never made the kernel so it’s understandable that most never bothered with it, although I used it for a few years before btrfs became viable.

  • Chickenstalker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Remove the file system because it is obsolete but not because of the author. Or are we shutting down NASA due to its Nazi ties?

    • JTskulk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right, they’re removing it because they can’t get maintainers. It’s obsolete, nobody ever said they’re removing it because of Hans Reiser.