• 0 Posts
  • 44 Comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: May 14th, 2024

help-circle
  • I’m not (currently) in a position where others would find it desirable to do so. Potentially in the future?

    It’s hard to imagine a scenario where this would happen and your voice would not otherwise be available. For example, if you went into politics, then you’d be a target, but you’d already be speaking in public all the time. It only takes a few seconds of a voice sample to do this nowadays and it’ll only get easier from here.

    Maybe just make a point to educate your family and friends on the risk of voice cloning so they don’t fall for phone scams.




  • This assumes a legitimate need to prove who you are outside the context of that specific site, rather than just within it. Sometimes that need is real, sometimes it is not.

    When it’s not, and you only need to prove you are the same person who created the account, then a simple username and password is sufficient. Use 2FA (via authenticator app or key, NOT via SMS or email) on top of that. This allows users to prove to a sufficient degree that they are the owner of that account.

    This is how most Lemmy instances work, for example. I can sign up by creating a username and password, with optional 2FA. They do not need my email. They do not need my phone number. They do not need my name, or my contacts, or anything else that is not related to my identity within their server.

    I realize that this is untenable at large scales for any communications platform. Spam (and worse) is a problem wherever there are easy and anonymous signups. I’m honestly not sure how Lemmy is as clean as it is. I guess it’s just not popular enough to attract spammers.



  • AnAmericanPotato@programming.devtoPrivacy@lemmy.ml[Deleted]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    18 days ago

    Another issue with Google Play is that there’s nothing stopping the developer from pushing out an update that doesn’t match the published source. It isn’t tied to GitHub or anything.

    Developers with apps on Google Play are frequently targeted with buyout requests from scammers looking to get malware to an existing user base. Or even if it’s not explicitly malware, it could be closed-source.

    For example, the “Simple Mobile Tools” app developer sold their apps a year or two ago. Now they have ads, in-app purchases, and god knows what else. If you had installed them from Google Play, you would have received these updates automatically. Those new versions don’t exist on f-droid, naturally. Anyone who was using them should really uninstall them and install the “Fossify” forks from f-droid.

    Every developer ID publishing on Google Play is potentially for sale. There are no real safeguards against this, and you might never know. At least with F-Droid it’s verified as open source and malicious (or just plain crappy) updates can be identified and dealt with, either by f-droid maintainers or by end users.






  • And it wouldn’t affect your ability to download torrents if you don’t have port forwarding on VPN, just your ability to upload

    This isn’t quite true. Two peers who both lack port forwarding will not be able to connect to each other at all. Once a connection is established between two peers, both uploading and downloading should work just fine.

    A significant portion of swarms are users like that, who can initiate connections but cannot receive incoming connections. This is especially problematic with smaller torrents. If you’re working with well-supported torrents with dedicated seeders and thousands of users, then it won’t really matter. But if you need something with just a couple seeders, you might find yourself stuck with zero accessible peers.



  • I think it’s just for enterprise contracts, yeah.

    Fedora seems like a good general-purpose pick to me, because it is modern, it has a large community, and it’s easy enough to install and use. It has similar advantages as Ubuntu — that is, a large community and broad commercial third-party support — without the downsides of having a lot of outdated software and lacking support for new hardware. I think Fedora is less likely to have show-stopping limitations than a lot of other distros, even beginner-friendly ones like Mint.

    But that’s just one opinion. There’s nothing wrong with Ubuntu or derivatives. I’ve heard good things about Pop_OS as well, though I’ve never tried it myself.




  • Tuta.com is similar to Proton Mail + Calendar.

    • Location: Germany

    • Governance: Private GmbH (German corporation, similar to an American LLC)

    • Integrity/trustworthiness/transparency: Better than Proton IMHO. All their apps are open source and available on F-Droid. They encrypt email headers (unlike Proton, who are weaselly about this in their marketing materials).

    • User Experience: Ehhhh…6? I’m not in the best position to compare because I do not have a premium plan, so I am not able to examine features like inbox rules/filters. Much like Proton, it doesn’t support full-text email search unless you have it cache your entire mailbox locally (either via the web site or app). They do not support POP or IMAP, but do offer their own desktop and mobile apps.

    • Pricing: €3/month for 20GB, €8/month for 500GB. https://tuta.com/pricing



  • That’s when Windows 10 stops getting security updates. Expect most software vendors to drop support for Windows 10 this year if they haven’t already. That doesn’t necessarily mean things will stop working, but it will not be tested and they won’t spend time fixing Win10-specific problems.

    In enterprise, you can get an additional three years of “extended security updates”. That’s your grace period to get everyone in your org upgraded.

    While I strongly relate to anyone who hates Windows 11, “continue using Windows 10 forever” was never a viable long-term strategy.

    Windows 10 was released in 2015. Ten years of support for an OS is industry-leading, on par with Red Hat or Ubuntu’s enterprise offerings and far ahead of any competing consumer OS. Apple generally only offers three years of security updates. Google provides 3-4 years of security updates. Debian gets 5 years.

    There has never been a time in the history of personal computing when using an OS for over 10 years without a major upgrade was realistic. That would be like using Windows 3.1 after XP was released. Windows 10 is dead, and it’s been a long time coming.

    Now go download Fedora.


  • Silly question perhaps, but are you sure you’re using the correct port on your Linux system? If I plug my external HD into a USB2 port, I’m stuck at 30-40MB/sec, while on a USB3 port I get ~150-180MB/sec. That’s proportionally similar to the difference you described so I wonder if that’s the culprit.

    You can verify this in a few different ways. From Terminal, if you run lsusb you’ll see a list of all your USB hubs and devices.

    It should look something like this:

    Bus 002 Device 001: ID xxxx:yyyy Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
    Bus 002 Device 002: ID xxxx:yyyy <HDD device name>
    Bus 003 Device 001: ID xxxx:yyyy Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
    Bus 004 Device 001: ID xxxx:yyyy Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
    

    So you can see three hubs, one of which is 2.0 and the other two are 3.0. The HDD is on bus 002, which we can see is a USB 3.0 hub by looking at the description of Bus 002 Device 001. That’s good.

    If you see it on a 2.0 bus, or on a bus with many other devices on it, that’s bad and you should re-organize your USB devices so your low-speed peripherals (mouse, keyboard, etc.) are on a USB2 bus and only high-speed devices are on the USB3 bus.

    You can also consult your motherboard’s manual, or just look at the colors of your USB ports. By convention, gray ports are USB 1.0, blue ports are 2.0, and green ports are 3.x.

    If you’re running KDE, you can also view these details in the GUI with kinfocenter. Not sure what the Gnome equivalent is.


  • Half the movies released in 3D during the last wave were poorly done conversions not even shot for 3D.

    Only half? -_-

    I’ve only seen a few movies that were actually filmed in 3D. Even Gravity was filmed in 2D.

    The problem is that actually filming in 3D requires using different (and expensive) hardware, and different creative direction all across the board. You can’t just upgrade to a 3D camera and call it a day. Not many studios will put in that kind of effort for something that is not proven in the market. And not many filmmakers are actually skilled at working in 3D, simply due to lack of direct experience.

    I saw the Hobbit movies in high framerate 3D in the theater, and while they were not good movies, they looked absolutely amazing because they were committed 100% to the format from start to finish — not just with the hardware, but with the lighting, makeup, set design, everything. It’s a shame the movies sucked, and it’s a shame that there has never been a way to watch them in HFR 3D outside of select theaters.