It would be useful to know the title of the book so I can easily remove it. Excluding the title of the book from this article is not reducing the risk of radicalization.
Mastodon: @greg@clar.ke
It would be useful to know the title of the book so I can easily remove it. Excluding the title of the book from this article is not reducing the risk of radicalization.
Why don’t they name the book?
two to power of four = 16
I think twatgate would be more appropriate
How dare you be helpful!
I’m not sure, I feel like Canada should be strengthening trade relationships with other countries.
I’m hoping for 100% tariffs on US Teslas and removing the current tariffs on Chinese EVs.
Plus you can give out really stupid email addresses that work
Facebook has ghost profiles of non Facebook users because of tracking embedded in “like” buttons on websites. If you wanted to go full paranoid I would suggest using an extension to change your user agent. But it is probably worth identifying the specific threat vectors you are concerned about.
Ladybird is a new open source engine.
As an Australian living in Canada I find winters difficult after a few weeks. So I usually plan a trip south in February. I’m trying to get better about winter sports like cross country skiing. I have a 3yo now which helps, I can learn about winter fun and games through her
Did you try switching your exit point?
Apples
Edit: I steal my neighbours apples
It’s likely bad actors causing your VPN’s public IP address to get flagged. Next time change the exit point.
lol, that backronym is a bit of a stretch. Saying “I have a photic sneeze reflex” explains what I have. Saying “I have Autosomal-dominant Compelling Helio-Ophthalmic Outburst” makes me sound I’m having a stroke and saying “I have ACHOO” makes me sound stupid 😅
MySpace complete with way too much customer JavaScript injection.
You’re hosted on lemmy.selfhostcat.com, cat in Chinese is Mao. You nearly got away with it China 🕵️♂️
I appreciate the intent but who cares what the people that planted this book want, lets focus on reducing radicalization. I’m not sure how informing folks about what books to look out for is going to increase radicalization. The argument that it might cause copy-cat incidents doesn’t really make any sense, it’s not like people are getting radicalized by reading CBC articles, they’re getting radicalized on social media. And I guarantee the title of this book is freely spreading in those toxic circles.