![](/static/61a827a1/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/44bf11eb-4336-40eb-9778-e96fc5223124.png)
It won’t keep track of my place in a Playlist to resume so I trashed it.
It won’t keep track of my place in a Playlist to resume so I trashed it.
I believe it should be possible to use cryptography to have the validator provide a key to the reviewer, and for the reviewer to sign the review with their key and the validator key, in such a way that a validator can validate a signed message used their key so is valid, but cannot know which reviewer it was. See Yang et. al. 2006 anonymous signature schemes in public key cryptography journal.
All W2s should come with an anonymous review sheet, but you still need a centralized validator.
Also Sen Sen candy which required a very specific palette
No, straight on the pussy
This changes the rules though from check at the end to check at every letter. That’s where the real efficiency gain is… The insertion of an all knowing checker who could have written it himself anyway. The math of permutations vs combinations changes drastically if we change the rules.
Crease distortion occurs immediately, day 1, first fold, and it’s a substantial distortion… but does not necessarily get exponentially worse like normal fatiguing plastic, but instead just gets worse slowly. Yeah it’ll last 50k folds but the crease distortion is definitely there in person.
So where’s my portable app to do so?
Why be scared when you’re so old and out of shape? He’s almost cooked as is.
Removed by mod
Zoom is so much better. Teams doesn’t even identify which screen pre-share. Oh you want to annotate or highlighter point? Install a plugin but only if you’re the organizer or allowed by the sharing party, and only if you’re using the native app.
Yeah so that’s the question, was any drug or other technique successfully optimized
There are so many things you want to do or know that you are incapable of knowing or doing because you are too stupid to learn it. No amount of trying will be enough. Your specific brain is incapable. Not everyone has the same abilities to do or learn, but may want to if they could.
I don’t see much in there. Doing the simulations is not the same as confirming the simulations. The question wasn’t did they do they simulation but rather was any major usable outcome validated. Seems very little if anything.
I’ve heard zoo keeper can be insanely competitive just to get a $0 internship or even pay money to work there and then the real jobs are also poverty level to work with animals.
But updates for what? You gain very little from security because nobody is targeting you and no new major features, so what’s it really worth? Maybe I’m wrong about my perception of those things though… I’ve used 2 androids for around 8 years each no problem.
deleted by creator
That is exactly what we want, a controllable much slower reaction to release a reasonable amount of energy at a time… The sun.
General sentiment of groupthink against ai by dumbasses here. AI has its place though, and this type of analysis is the perfect application for ai for image content search.
These are cybertruck owners…