The odds of you getting your own IPv4 address are pretty low, unless seedboxes have very different rules than I’d expect. Presumably you have a shared IP behind NAT, and they forward ports (not unlike a good VPN)

In that case, they would need the IP address, incoming port, and a very specific timestamp.

I didn’t realize Canada even had a “People with Delicious Faces” party, let alone that he was a member.

You’re assuming they would object to that. I haven’t seen anything to support that assumption.

Be careful with the last two. Depending on context, these could come across as stalking.

I have no need for a truck, and I still considered getting one. The Lightning is very impressive all around.

It makes more sense if you start from the other side - EVs are a niche market, and an electric truck is a small subset of that.

The Cybertruck sold 38,965 units last year, vs 33,510 for the Ford F150 Lightning.

…Well that’s certainly a memorable phrase.

That is 100% how he’ll deal with egg prices, if he ever cares enough to pretend to help the common man.

You’re asking for an abstract indicator of a concept. You might as well be trying to draw ‘dignity’.

Everything else will become obsolete with time, and that’s not necessarily a bad thing. We have countless icons that have long since been separated from their original meanings. The need for it to be intuitive is when the concept is new, not as it changes.

Apple would probably setup a subsidiary company, let’s call it Apple Canada, to operate the official app store for Canadian users. They would then funnel that money around the world to get it back to the parent company with little/no tax paid.

They’re trying to redefine electricity as a privilege. As in, we shouldn’t expect/rely on it.

Even in all but the worst dystopian worlds, the people have electricity.

There is evidence for certain events. However, once you get into it, you realize they’re all just… Ordinary.

For instance, Noah’s Ark can be traced back to an area that floods regularly. A merchant built a boat as an evacuation plan. One year, the floods were really bad, and he had to use his boat.

That’s it. Exaggeration and artistic license turned that into what we know today.

Do you really think this is as bad as it’s going to get?

Related, Pirate Bay used to (might still?) have a section where they mock all of the threatening letters that cite a different jurisdiction. Usually the US DMCA, but also similar laws from other countries.

They never posted any letters that cited Swedish (IIRC) law, because those were valid threats.

As someone who’s been in a similar situation (they split, but couldn’t afford to move out), I don’t recommend it. Shortly after we split, they got back together.

The entire situation was a heavy drag on our (short) time together, and is certainly a factor in why we didn’t work out.

Where does ‘separated’ come into it? This sounds like an open relationship. Assuming the other party actually knows, which is doubtful.

One of the biggest problems with this country is that most of them aren’t unconstitutional. Sure there are exceptions (which others will name), but we’ve been building up the president to be a king for a very long time. We’ve counted on elections and Congress to prevent that, which is amazing that it didn’t implode sooner.

“flush it out” instead of “flesh it out” when designing a plan

You should only use the weird in its full context:

Not without a lack of disregard

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ahold