Sorry to burst your bubble but POTUS is a management position. You oversee millions of jobs as the head of the Executive branch.

It is a job that the vast majority do not have the skills or temperament to manage with any degree of competence. The plantation owner who oversaw the hundreds of jobs/slaves of the past might have been able to be the head of a smaller and weaker government but the modern farmer isn’t going to have skills that transfer to POTUS.

The reason why it’s finance, politicians, and lawyers that end up in the job is those are the fields whose skills actually do transfer.

POTUS isn’t an entry level job. You should have governmental experience and a history of managing large organizations.

POTUS shouldn’t be an entry level job.

No they didn’t. That was the result of years of absolutely moronic economic and monetary policy combined with a ton of theft by people at the top levels of government and the national oil company.

The USA isn’t helping Venezuela’s government to steal from it’s people since they stopped getting a cut.

More likely trying to enable democracy and a functional economy to once again exist in Venezuela.

deleted by creator

Literally the top choice for beater chefs knife in kits around the world. My Henkles and Globals are nice knives but if Im splitting up a partly frozen whole chicken Im using the victorinox because it is made to be abused

Yes but ideologically China is not aligned with fascism at all. They are on paper still pretending to be Marxists. Fascism is opposed to Marxism.

Authoritarian, which you already mentioned.

They are talking about car subsidies which China does and not all countries do in all markets.

Only if it had something to do with race. If it’s because you don’t think their manufacturing standards are high enough to feel safe that wouldn’t be racist per se.

China is closer to neo-mercantilism due to the level if direct state involvement in private business.

Unfortunately I already have been assaulted

Read the link as it does in fact discuss this. I did supply evidence you just haven’t read it.

And the flared base is not the side that goes in your ass

It’s in the link I supplied. They talk about how it went from twenty nine years old to seventy from 1930 to now. You want to guess what the biggest change was for Inuit in that time?

The fact that the brain needs glucose means your brain does need carbs. You might not need to eat carbs to get that glucose but that’s different.

The fact is we have no idea how healthy or unhealthy a keto diet is long term for people with “normal” digestion.

https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/82-003-x/2008001/article/10463/4149059-eng.htm

Source on premodern Inuits living substantially shorter lifespans

Obviously I can’t source a negative that there aren’t dietary studies on people with “normal” digestion doing keto for decades. You can try finding them and discovering no e have been done on your own.

Fun fact they talk about pre-modern Inuit diets in your link but completely avoid the fact the Inuit died of natural causes substantially earlier than almost all cultures. It’s weird how often those pushing keto reference the Inuit but avoid that bit. Modernity has changed this significantly so modern Inuit have similar lifespans to other people.

https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/82-003-x/2008001/article/10463/4149059-eng.htm

That’s because they aren’t what I asked for though to be fair Im also aware those sources do not exist because we haven’t done those studies.

The fact that the Inuit traditionally have a much shorter lifespan is a fairly well documented fact. It’s really hard living in the Arctic and it is extremely likely that you do need some plants to live a more normal life. You’ll note it’s never academics that bring them up as an example for how keto is “totes healthy” (again we don’t know if it is for decades on end).

Yes but the fix for that specific issue is fat not veggies