• 3 Posts
  • 1.18K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle

  • If only NASA could run experiments so that we could understand how the concept of fear-based self preservation eliminates any semblance of courage when faced with even the smallest threat to their ill-defined paradigm of manhood.

    You’re significantly underestimating how many Chud engineers NASA employs. The agency that was founded by Nazis refugees has always had a shit history on race politics, cinema hagiographies produced decades later notwithstanding.

    In a parallel universe where we have a functioning federal government

    One of the biggest jokes of the US depiction of the Space Race was how many times we got our asses drubbed by Russians with less money, manpower, and educational resources, simply because our administration was so cartoonishly incompetent. We have an obscenely wealthy federal government that can afford to fuck up on the scale of trillions of dollars and still come out ahead.








  • I mean they voted for it so shrugs.

    330M Americans and 77M of them voted for Trump while 75M voted for Harris. The 77M were distributed across a selection of states with 312 EC votes, which is why he won. Harris’s 75M would have carried her if she’d traded a few hundred thousand votes in Texas or Florida for a winning balance in Georgia, Arizona, Pennsylvania, and Michigan. This, despite the fact that nobody voted for Harris in the primaries.

    To say “the Americans voted for this” puts far too much credit on the dysfunctional, byzantine, and ultimately anti-populist presidential selection system. Americans don’t get to decide their president in any meaningful capacity. Not to get all annoyingly-conservative with the talking points, but we really do live in a Roman-style Republican more than a Greek-style Democracy.








  • What I was referring to is Goedel’s incompleteness theorem which says that in a logic system there are things that are true that cannot be proven in the system, and logic systems can become complex enough that you can’t prove they’re consistent.

    If you get into the real guts of the theorem, the limit becomes a system attempting to describe itself.

    But there’s plenty of room for logical analysis outside the artificially engineered naval gazing that Goedel uses to prove incompleteness.

    in logic you sometimes have to build on foundations you can’t prove to be true, despite believing very strongly that they are.

    In logic, you do have certain unprovable truths known as axioms, which you use to form the foundation of a model. And one way to evaluate a model is to try and prove statements that force one axiom to contradict another (typically referred to as a paradox).

    “Time Travel is impossible” is a conclusion we can make IRL, but not one that holds in a narrative fantasy.