🔍🦘🛎

Someone tries to shoot you? Believe it or not, baguette.

Become famous for producing infinite food, get shot by a religious fanatic whose beliefs don’t align with the supernatural talents you possess. That or just a corporate hit by Frito-Lays.

HyperNormalisation is a 2016 BBC documentary by British filmmaker Adam Curtis. It argues that following the global economic crises of the 1970s, governments, financiers and technological utopians gave up on trying to shape the complex “real world” and instead established a simpler “fake world” for the benefit of multi-national corporations that is kept stable by neoliberal governments.

[HyperNormalization] describes paradoxes of Soviet life during the 1970s and 1980s. He says everyone in the Soviet Union knew the system was failing, but no one could imagine any alternative to the status quo, and politicians and citizens alike were resigned to maintaining the pretense of a functioning society. Over time, the mass delusion became a self-fulfilling prophecy, with everyone accepting it as the new norm rather than pretend, an effect Yurchak termed hypernormalisation.

-Wikipedia

What do* code monkey think

🎵Code Monkey get up, get coffee🎶

🎶Code Monkey go to job🎵

🎵Code Monkey have boring meeting🎶

🎶Boring manager Rob🎵

It’s a movie, highly recommend!

Seen “Cashback”?

No that’s RFK

Ah, gotcha.

Well, if mod actions are reported to admins, they already do a review on the mod, I imagine. So in this case, this post should lead to a mod review, right? Not sure if OP had already gone through official channels. I personally haven’t had to look into this topic before.

So I guess, if admins see that a mod is removing factual information to fit their agenda, that should be grounds for removal. Wikipedia has robust moderation and certainly couldn’t be considered misinformation.

Removal of misinformation should require a mod discussion/panel review. Sources can be deemed to be misinformation by a mod majority vote and the list they maintain should be public.

Removed Wikipedia articles cited as misinformation looks pretty egregious to me

Chiron Beta Prime - Jonathan Coulton

Excellent tracklist. The Pogues are heavily featured in our household

Correct! We like to travel~ I make sure to send all my nieces/nephews birthday cards and nice Christmas presents

No kids, never wanted them, made sure I never have them. Happily married for 8 years, she never wants kids either.

My friend group has been having a lot of fun with Beyond All Reason. Also free/open source RTS

AI delivery bots maybe? It’s basically an aggregate of “here’s where it’s possible/common to walk” so it’s not useful for driving/flying AI. Also useful for marketing, knowing where foot traffic is.

The article says they’re treating it as a Large Geospatial Model (like a Large Language Model), so it seems like you could use that as a predictive way to navigate between two points. With an LLM it spits out phrases based on context. The LGM would return paths based on context.

Hear y’all hear y’all, Reggie King from o’er the holler brought pawpaw moonshine for the weddin’

Ah, I didn’t do enough digging

Also it doesn’t seem to let you see anything risque without logging in, so honestly even if a kid went to the site they wouldn’t see anything