Basically same as N I think since tweets have a max size.
Basically same as N I think since tweets have a max size.
Nyan Cat, but different
I wish them luck with that!
Weirdly enough, I went to a book store one time, picked up one of his newer books, didn’t think I’d like it from the summary, but I read the first few pages and was hooked. Had to leave so I figured I would read the rest by downloading from libgen.is…
First time I’ve felt significantly disappointed not being able to read a book :'(
Damn, i really need to figure out how I can block lemmygrad in its entirety. While there are some interesting people there, I’ve seen 3 separate comments from accounts there posting absolute drivel just in the past 15 minutes!
Egalitarianism? Just as ambiguously defined too!
This is pretty standard left wing stuff, tankie garbage would be like: “we need to create a dictatorship of the proletariat to prevent climate change”
Edit: well maybe it might be a little bit tankie from the last bit
Russia is a capitalist oligopoly tho?
I’ve heard stuff like “communists want community”, but perhaps we are in different social environments. I will agree though that the manipulation of some terms might be more extreme than others.
Political conservatism obeys none of the other dictionary definitions. It’s just a label. It’s the label chosen by generations of influential public figures whose general philosophy is “Well someone has to be the king.”
Isn’t this kinda true of most politically-associated labels? Communism, socialism, capitalism, egalitarianism, progressivism… they can all be thought of as general ideas, but when someone actually uses them, they could be referring to a more specific concept, or twisting the idea a bit, or referring to a specific person’s definition of the idea and its kinda hard to know how to interpret it…
Love GrapheneOS, don’t love the weird combative community culture, or (former) lead developer tho…
Hmmm… words used in not-satiric circumstances where the true meaning isn’t the intended meaning is a bit confusing…
everyone is equal and thus should have equal rights and treatment under the law
Isn’t that like the definition of (clasical) liberalism?
What about capitalism requires infinite growth? And what does it require infinite growth in? What happens when growth stagnates in a capitalist system? Does it suddenly not become capitalist anymore?
Hmmm, its those kinds of extreme statements that make me a bit suspicious. Is global warming really an extinction level event? I can imagine terrible civil wars over resources and increasing displacement from natural disasters, but total eradication of the human race is afaik not a possible result of global warming.
What is egalitarianism?
Its also a functional programming language!