• 0 Posts
  • 11 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 2nd, 2023

help-circle




  • These numbers feel arbitrary to me, while a scale of 0 to 100 feels very intuitive.

    The only “arbitrary” number to remember in Fahrenheit when talking about weather is the freezing point, 32 degrees.

    It’s the natural intuitiveness of 0-100 scales that also makes me prefer Celsius for non-weather applications, since the phase changes of water become more important when talking about cooking or chemistry.



  • I will be controversial and say that I think Fahrenheit makes more sense when talking about the weather. Its scale simply makes more sense on human terms: 0 is fucking cold, 100 is fucking hot. This is about the tempurature range you can expect to experience between winter and summer throughout much of the world.

    Celsius makes more sense for cooking (and everything else) since its scale is calibrated around the phase changes of water.


  • beefcat@beehaw.orgtoMemes@lemmy.mlThis is the way
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I did not expect so many upvoted poacher sympathizers in this thread. I am disappointed.

    Poachers aren’t poor. They make assloads of money off their illegitimate trade. They have plenty of skills that could be put to profitable use elsewhere. They simply choose poaching because it is more profitable.


  • beefcat@beehaw.orgtoMemes@lemmy.mlSir I am broke
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s easier to build charging stations when we already have a massive grid for distributing electricity. We have no such infrastructure in place for distributing hydrogen. Producing hydrogen cleanly and efficiently is still a hard problem we haven’t really solved.


  • beefcat@beehaw.orgtoMemes@lemmy.mlSir I am broke
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Hydrogen trades volumetric energy density for gravimetric energy density. It is too difficult to build a car that can safely hold a reasonable amount of hydrogen without making it bigger or sacrificing cargo space, and building a distribution network on the same scale as gasoline is a problem we still have no idea how to solve.

    I think hydrogen will be much more viable in shipping, where these problems are much less pronounced. Big trucks and container ships are less concerned with volume (weight is more important). And they move along common and predictable routes meaning you don’t need quite so many hydrogen gas stations. You distribution just needs to cover truck stops and ports.