Here’s a bit of code that’s supposed to do stuff. I got this error message. Any ideas what could cause this error and how to fix it? Also, add this new feature to the code.

Works reasonably well as long as you have some idea how to write the code yourself. GPT can do it in a few seconds, debugging it would take like 5-10 minutes, but that’s still faster than my best. Besides, GPT is also fairly fluent in many functions I have never used before. My approach would be clunky and convoluted, while the code generated by GPT is a lot shorter.

If you’re well familiar with the code you’ve working on, GPT code will be convoluted by comparison. If so, you can ask GPT for the rough alpha version, and you can do the debugging and refining in a few minutes.

Nice! That was a fascinating way to look at it. Makes sense too.

Do they smell good?

Wow! That’s a proper sea of flowers.

Gorgeous!

If monofloral relationships require too much commitment, why not consider joining a polyfloral rainbow butterfly community. Maybe polyfloral is the way to go.

LOL. That’s pretty brutal.

Those like really nice. Also, once you’ve landed on one, the others aren’t far away.

It’s a top secret human experiment to see how different people interpret it.

If you’re into botany/entomology, this is the time and place for you to shine. If you’re out for the giggles, that should work equally well. Other options are also equally valid.

LOL. Good catch. Maybe that’s one of the things I should have fixed in the fifth edit.

But in those movies Mr Giga Chad Protagonist never runs out of guns, ammo or one liners. Taking a few hits will only make him angry.

I edit nearly all of my messages, because I swipe too fast, autocorrect does its own thing etc. Usually, it takes about two seconds to figure out a better way to say it, but those seconds start ticking after sending the first version.

An AI ga also do the job, spend the money on Netflix and watch the movies for you.

As an international Lemmy user, my biased, uninformed, misguided and objectively wrong perception is that Americans solve these things with guns.

Source: Never been to USA, but I’ve seen lots of Hollywood action movies produced in the 80s and 90s.

“It’s also worth reiterating that despite its name, OpenAI is a closed-source and for-profit company — while DeepSeek’s AI models are open-source.”

Smells like there’s a lawsuit just around the corner. How do you license a model as open source if the training data was stolen?

That’s what happens when people don’t know how to use the system properly. They just throw their files and announcements into random places without any thought, and expect everyone to be able to find them.

In cases like that, you just need to ask a more experienced user for direction, because nothing else works. It’s not your fault you can’t find your way around a labyrinth like this. It’s the fault of everyone who turned that place into a labyrinth.

Can we also blame the software? Maybe, if the marketing was misreading. Mostly though, this sort of mess emerges as a result of ignorant people abusing the system.

Now that’s a properly meta headline. Are you sure this wasn’t written by The Onion?

Ad supported videos act as a demo. Those who can tolerate ads, can stay in the demo stage. If you have tried the videos, found them valuable, and can’t tolerate the ads, I suggest paying for the video in the future.

There’s value in having both systems in place. If you have only one, it’s going to limit your options and hurt everyone involved.

This is big news. Why isn’t everyone already talking about SIBs? Also, the 145 Wh/kg sits neatly between LFP and NMC. As long as the other properties are reasonable, it should stand a chance against NMC.

The article also mentions sodium ion batteries as an alternative. Can’t wait to see how they perform in real life.