Someone producing a degradable product that has no buyers is not what is meant when discussing irrational actors.

no one proposed that but you

saying it’s basic is hand waiving. say what you mean.

I understand that markets are populated by irrational actors.

did it work?

opening some of the jails.

they are far enough away from any reasonable target to be safe, and with a few motivated friends, I might be able to pull a few bank jobs.

more non falsifiable vaguery

the entire problem with your comment is that you are using vague language and not defining your terms. as a result, you have presented unfalsifiable theory.

no one should believe anything you’ve written here.

animal liberation front did some good work. earth liberation front, just stop oil… you get the idea I hope

they can organize among themselves. affinity groups that practice direct action are like my favorite political orgs.

I just want to say I love militant vegans, so long as militant means they are organized and actively creating the world they want to live in. if they are just preaching, I would not say they are militant, just evangelical.

and, to be clear, I’m neither. I just find militancy admirable.

Would fewer non human animals be exploited in a meatless Monday world? Yes.

I wouldn’t count on it

honestly too light

I thought you said it was common knowledge. is it groundbreaking research?

I’m right, so I have no reason to change course.

getting snowed isn’t something to brag about

having seen them repeatedly target other users, spin up new instances, and keep on doing it, I have no compunction about calling this shit out

I don’t have any strong opinions on the matter, but I do have strong opinions about Phil’s conduct.

where is this

this is nonsense.

I think their goal at this point is to try to push a narrative that I am “toxic as fuck” and did some various outlandish things and need to be banned or defederated

do you think that because it’s explicitly what I’ve been saying?