If this is your fear, why not just have a will or something that specifically describes what to do and where to go?

To me it’s a bit too much like download/upload. Though I guess depending on the context that’s sort of like load/save.

For English speakers I could see this working, but I imagine the letters would have to change per language which would be suboptimal.

I know I’m wrong for thinking this but it looks too much like open to me.

Dixon Cider

First stop: Arby’s. I’m going to die anyways.

I don’t know if I hate it but it’s annoying how opening links inside Teams tends to open in Teams instead of the real expected app.

It’s like they want a whole OS inside of Teams.

Besides that: slack just feels better and less clunky for text chats.

How does a doddle compare to a jiffie?

That sounds like a lot of filter words. Thanks for the suggestion though!

And yet somehow we have questions that revolve around US politics geopolitical depressants.

Makes me think that platforms banning Trump after Jan 6 were just kissing up to Biden coming in. Maybe there is just a cycle of capitalist sucking up.

+1.

I wish we had type c but all cables were labeled with clear functionality from the start. I don’t like data/power only cables.

I’m guessing this is a cost thing. You don’t need to pay for fact checking anymore.

… still obnoxious and pushing us towards a dead echo chamber internet. Get ready for AI personalities voting on community notes.

That relies on donations which may or may not come. I understand in a perfect world that makes sense, but in the real world even those foundations often rely on corporate muscle. Without that enterprise money, I’m not sure how they’d stand.

This is probably a minority opinion, but I think OSS prospers most when there is corporate muscle behind it.

A company with paid engineers that puts engineering time into fixing and bettering open source software can possibly be a good company.

Closed source ends up being the worst of all worlds. If there is an issue, you’re stuck waiting for someone else to possibly fix it. At least in open source, either you can try to fix it, or you can pay someone else to try to fix it.

At the end of the day, I think a lot of the Linux success actually comes down to this.

Even in ipfs, I don’t understand discoverability. Sort of sounds like it still needs a centralized list of metadata to content I’d, etc.

Hashed by whom? Who has the source of truth for the hashes? How would you prevent it from being poisoned? … or are you saying a non-distributed (centralized) hash store?

If centralized: you have a similar problem to IA today. If not centralized: How would you prevent poisoning? If enough distributed nodes say different things, the truth can be lost.

In theory this could be true. In practice, data would be ripe for poisoning. It’s like the idea of turning every router into a last mile CDN with a 20TB hard drive.

Then you have to think about security and not letting the data change from what was originally given. Idk. I’m sure something is possible, but without a real ‘omph’ nothing big happens.

Duh fuq.

I wonder how many people would give their social that easily.

Have you heard of adblocking?