• 2 Posts
  • 26 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: September 16th, 2023

help-circle



  • They are “on their side” when it’s in their interest to do so. Which, bluntly, is true for almost all people. Absolute altruism–doing a ‘good’ thing for which you receive absolutely no reward (including public recognition or a sense of smug superiority) at all–is so rare as to be extinct. That’s how politics is always played, my dude

    …that’s literally what I have been saying. Matter of fact, your whole reply was just a different way of saying the same thing. You just repeated my points and tried to be cool by adding the “my dude” at the end.

    I’m done with this pointless conversation. Goodbye


  • Indeed they can and do support things…things that will allow them to make more money. They are called investments.

    The “fight” with DeSantis was all theatre and their “win” simply allows them to continue to rule on their land as if nothing changed.

    And I think you are mixing correlation with causation: just because they happen to support and give money to Democrats, it doesn’t mean they stand by them. In the same link you shared, it shows they gave money to the Republicans and Nikki Haley…which is not something someone would do if they truly supported the things you said they do.

    And that’s the whole point. They are not someone. They are a company, controlled by individuals who are simply looking to maximize profits. You think they are left- or center-aligned but that is simply because that reflects the majority of their customer base. If tomorrow the right suddenly comprised the majority of their customers, they would change side immediately.

    I cannot believe people in 2024 still think giant multinational companies can “be on their side”




  • While I do absolutely agree that single issue politics is a real thing like you showed, literally the only reply to your comment was “if you are a single issue voter, you’re an idiot”.

    So I also think OP has a point here and we’re talking more about the people who use the term as an ad hominem attack, which I certainly have seen plenty of. And now Lemmy has provided us with yet another example of people taking something legitimate and turning it into a weakness/attackable offence. Like some trolls and racist people on the right now talk about DEI in negative terms










  • I’d like to add to the sentiment of this post by saying that if you ever used any of those amazing websites, I’m sure the developers will highly appreciate it if those with the means could consider contributing to their projects.

    We all know how greedy and shameless YouTube can be, and yet those developers give us incredible products for free. And if you ever saw the entitled requests of some users on their projects’ pages whenever YouTube implements some changes, and they have to rush to fix their code, I’m sure you would appreciate them even more. I’ve personally seen quite a few projects being abandoned because of the sometimes thankless job of being a developer, and I would hate it for any of these to suffer a similar fate.

    So if you can and are willing, feel free to join me in contributing to:





  • Thank you for sharing! That was a very interesting read with a lot of great information. I feel like adding a bit on the article in the future might invite more people to join in the conversation too :)


    Abstract. Recent excavations at Çatalhöyük in Anatolia, Turkey have recovered remains of textiles, cordage and basketry that add to finds from previous work at this Neolithic site. Along with occurrences from other sites in the Near East, North Africa and Europe, they enable charting the development of textile techniques. This paper argues that the woven textiles found in Çatalhöyük (6700–6500 cal. BC) fit in a long development in the Palaeolithic, Epipalaeolitic and Pre-Pottery Neolithic periods, during which strings and basketry techniques were used to produce a large variety of objects such as shelters, rigid containers, and flexible fabrics that may be termed textiles. Çatalhöyük is currently the earliest site where preserved woven textiles have been found and forms the starting point for our discussion of the emergence of textile technologies. Weaving appears across a wide geographical area in the first half of the 7th millennium cal. BC. We argue that two of the earliest attested basketry techniques, weft-twining, and weft-wrapping (soumak and related techniques), are closely connected to the development of weaving. The size and edges of textiles, matting and basketry provide the basis to reconstruct tools, loom types and production technology and give important insights in a society’s gendered technological development, that are different from those provided by the study of lithic, ceramic or metal technology. Many find spots in the Near East, North Africa and Europe document this development.