The 5 star reviews are… well they are something.

People being put on some list like that “without their consent” is a totally different topic in my mind. To me that’s more of a system failure rather than a problem with what the system is attempting to accomplish. The first person mentioned though had quotes alluding to the person ostensibly consenting. So that again is a bit of a different topic that would focus on what constitutes informed consent. That being said I’ve approached this under the assumption that the DNR order is valid and from a fully informed and consenting person.

That being said, the fact that they have actual lists is mind boggling. I can’t understand why a list like that would even need to exist. That information should be with the records for that person, not jumbled into a list with other people. So as far as something being a culture shock to me, that right there.

Further, your 10 questions and other comments seem to be conflating DNR with suicide. This might be where we have a cultural difference. In the US, DNR is not usually conflated in this way. It is also not conflated with euthanasia which is closer to suicide. I’m assuming most users here are either US based or some other country with similar views on DNR to the US. I have a feeling this is where most people commenting are confused with how you are discussing this topic.

You aren’t explaining “your environment” well. You are being way too vague and abstract on these concepts.

the patient’s perspective would never fly in my environment

This doesn’t make sense. Your “environment” not regarding a person’s choice to forego certain medical treatment sounds more like a personal preference. It’s hard to envision anywhere not understanding there are people that wish to discontinue medical treatment for whatever reason. Whether you personally agree with it or not is irrelevant to the overall environment. So the way you have approached that topic feels like it’s your opinion rather than the overall culture of your “environment”.

So can you elaborate on your “environment” and how it regards someone opting to not be resuscitated? If you want a specific, consider an elderly person with aggressive cancer along to be DNR?

Well what is your viewpoint? After multiple comments I still can’t piece it together.

Doctor Mike is a real doctor with a youtube channel. He reviews multiple episodes of House and they’re hilarious. It’s like every time House has some epiphany and orders some new radical treatment he winds up yelling “WHY!?” into the ether.

And the bots they need to pump those numbers.

TBI?

Fuck me in the ass cause I love Jesus!

(Such as “Destruction of Evidence” charges)

Just checked my state’s law. It specifies “intentionally” destroying the evidence. If you have it set up to do it after a certain amount of inactivity, your intent is not to destroy evidence. By all means a corrupt judicial system or police force could still abuse it. But it shouldn’t be illegal (at least in my state).

Physically impossible to open the door in a fashion it was meant to be. Airplane doors are designed to open inwards. The air pressure inside the plane pushed the door into place evenly over the entire surface. Given an approximate pressure differential of 8psi spread across a minimum 24x48" airplane for would be 10,752 pounds of force that would need to be overcome to open the door. There is no way to apply that kind of force from inside the plane that wouldn’t catastrophically damage the door prior to opening. You can’t just pull the handle that hard without it breaking. There’d be nothing to grab that would pull out in without failure.

So maybe you could rig up a machine to break a portion of the door and create a hole. But the door would in no way be intact or functional afterwards.

They must have had a way to get in the first time, for instance.

Not necessarily. There are lots of comparisons to submarines but it’s more comparable to airplanes. Part of the security on a plane is that it is physically impossible to open the door while the plane is flying. The pressure difference between the pressurized inside and thin air outside would require superhuman force to open.

In a similar vein, when the ISS was constructed it wasn’t initially pressurized. This would make opening the door from the outside trivial from a pressurization standpoint. As long as the only means to pressurize it could be triggered from inside, there’d be no way it would be pressurized without someone inside.

Nothing a little reprogramming can’t fix.

I feel like that should be “will have shat”

Best I can do is unceremoniously flop your limp corpse on the pile and sprinkle a little lye on it.

I have add and take adderall. My alarm is set for 7 and 8. At 7, I get up, take my meds (more than just adderall), let the dogs out, and feed them. I do all this trying to stay as “asleep” as possible and go right back down to nap until 8. By then the adderall has started to kick in and I literally can’t stay asleep.

Had a similar experience at a job. One source of resistance I found was engineers knowing upper management had absolutely no stomach for the type of change that the company desperately needed. This would lead to them likely not implementing anything meaningful. So rather than waste their time helping me and getting on board with the changes, they just kept churning out the same trash and questioned why I hadn’t made all their lives better.

Everyone wants change so long as they don’t have to be the ones to change.

He’s also been known to associate with the hacker known as 4chan.

We live in a snowy area and during the winter we can have an entire month just not produce.

Not this one?

I had no idea we had people illegally immigrating that much. Bet they’re the type to use the word “illegals” pejoratively.