wait until she replies her hobby is answering questions on asklemmy

only half of them

Should have phrased it differently: Banning a post on a specific linux distribution is not a “ban on discussing linux” in general.

google used to work so well in the past when they still had these features

The linked article has a screenshot with a link to a post about openKylin getting removed. OP title is “Facebook ban on discussing Linux?” including the question mark. I don’t think it is accurate. At the same time I’m not defending Facebook in any way.

Discussing a specific linux distribution is not “discussing linux”.

Linking to a post on another website about a linux distribution isn’t either.

someone using xp probably won’t mind using some outdated linux kernel as well

You are not alone.

PR does not help long term if you don’t deliver.

No one mention any far right talking points

What makes those safer to use than the phone itself? Is it because they are considered part of the car so you are “allowed” to use them?

Ok did any twitter user believe they owned their account?

agree, but for some reason many people don’t seem to think that way

Mastodon or Lemmy, because you would have to choose an instance and a client. Threads, because why would you?

How do you know how far you got? Do you remember the last number the next day?

This could be a nice little computer if it had good linux support

It was referring to this part:

some people will want to stay on Chrome. So for them, this IS a problem.

They want to keep using a product even though they don’t like it. A product that is free to use just like most of its alternatives.

They made a choice, they live with the consequences.

Maybe limiting internet usage is enough, spending extra time on a linux pc with no internet might just be an opportunity to learn something.

Wasn’t it unblocked again soon after?