Procrastinating at work, while trying to come with some lie about previous three days of procrastination before a meeting.
Procrastinating at work, while trying to come with some lie about previous three days of procrastination before a meeting.
Sad part is, at first I wrote it correctly. 😅
And a gaming chair!
I just started at the end of november, at first I almost gave up. There are couches so I’ve just booked one for two months, it’s expensive as hell, but now there is incencitive to go and put some effort. 😄
Also never had anyone so supportive in my entire life, every time it’s hard they say “you can do it, just one more time”, lol.
They are playing the long game here. Literal mind virus.
It is simple retirement.
You can be as familiar with the rules as you want as long as you haven’t done specific song and dance that specific editor likes to see before editing you aren’t allowed to do it. They are vicious and will delete an article itself if you will try and raise a fuss, under a pretence of topic not being notable. Not a complaint, there is systemic issue in wikipedia and it’s getting worse, while wikipedia acknowledges that it exists they do nothing about it.
Have you seen an ad about wikipedia needing new contributors even once?
For example if you blindly apply this and forget, you may encounter problems with ipv6 or with your vpn. So it’s really depends on your use case and not hardening in general.
You definitely shouldn’t copy and paste things like this.
Have you actually tried to edit something on wikipedia? It’s run by bots that will remove your edits. Example: in article about Argentina there was a bullshit paragraph about rio de la plata being named so by “english sailors who thought it looked like plate”, that’s 1) regarded and incorrect 2) no sources to the claim was given, I’ve tried to remove it multiple times, it stayed there, even worse, I think it migrated to other languages as well. That’s just my last interaction with wikipedia, when understading that people aren’t welcome came. It’s mostly automated, there is no way to make these people remove bogus shit if another clown already placed it there. Your efforts would be ridiculed, you will be banned for not following one of billion obscure rules. It really is captured.
I don’t care about Musk and had no idea about his stance on wikipedia. He is a dumb cunt.
My spoiler was in response to “I’d need much more specific evidence before dismissing it”, so my evidence would be dismissed anyway.
You do actually publish new relevant information to enciclopedias, that’s why they created new editions in time when they were printed on paper.
My initial point was and still is, wikipedia devours itself due to editors and their egos.
There is nothing ridiculous about it, they even have specific terms for countless abuses by “senior editors”, e.g. wikilawyer, content authoritharian you can look it up. Their policy was/is “Verifiability, not truth”. As for evidence, there is plenty:
Well, you were going to dismiss whatever I will link you, so there were no point in providing links
org-roam but logseq is good too.
Well just create another service with mounted paths and run shell script inside it or use systemd run --property ...
?
What do you meam by outside of service, but within systemd?
Do people put soap in the sink?
I can’t solve Cloudflare captcha most of the time, so I renewed my accessibility cookie at least once every 3–4 weeks, but they started to last a shorter amount of time. So now I just close the tab and move on.
That was the whole point of locking down everything and making it illegal to fix by yourself.
It will bite them in the ass when next generation would have a lot less people who can work for these companies (it’s already happening).
Because it was half-assed and from canonical.