no one is fine with abusing animals

chickens don’t menstruate

disroot

autistici

Respect people asking you to disengage in this instance. Just stop replying. Likewise if you want someone to disengage, don’t also write a wall of text to which they might feel they need to reply. Just reply with disengage.

if this is an instance-wide rule, it should be stated in the main sidebar. it’s not a deal breaker for me, but I strongly feel people should be encouraged to use the block feature, rather than getting the power to decide who is allowed to participate in a discussion.

don’t tell me what to do.

please disengage so I can move on with my day.

Lemmy supports blocking users

veganism doesn’t help animals - not even in a supply and demand way

supply and demand is a theory about price discovery. it has nothing to do w with whether buying beans helps animals… which it doesn’t.

You insist there is 0 suffering during animal agriculture

I never did that

you either think it is wrong to abuse/rape

everyone opposes this

do you know who you’re talking to?

his ban for “bad faith” against return2ozma was ridiculous.

!newsondb0@lemmy.dbzer0.com

09f911029d74e35bd84156e5635688c0

I think lol

nope. last “e” is a “c”. real close tho

disroot

depending on your politics, autistici

have a nice day

it’s not antivegan, and no lexicon, encyclopedic or scholarly article would support the assertion it is. it’s not about how I define it: it’s about how it is defined in reputable sources.

isn’t your point that you think by abstaining from consuming meat, meat production will be impacted? the production grows incessantly. it’s obvious that meat producers do not care whether you buy meat.

your original point was that you bear no responsibility for the deaths of animals you consume

right. and this speaks directly to that.

even one death that was prevented has value.

but that has never worked, has it?

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/meat-production-tonnes?tab=chart&country=%7EOWID_WRL