That depends on how you use it. If you need the information from an article, but don’t want to read it, I agree, an LLM is probably the wrong tool. If you have several articles and want go decide which one has the information you need, an LLM is a pretty good option.

Yup, the problem with that iPhone (4?) wasn’t that it sucked, but that it had limitations. You could just put a case on it and the problem goes away.

LLMs are pretty good at a number of tasks, and they’re also pretty bad at a number of tasks. They’re pretty good at summarizing, but don’t trust the summary to be accurate, just to give you a decent idea of what something is about. They’re pretty good at generating code, just don’t trust the code to be perfect.

You wouldn’t use a chainsaw to build a table, but it’s pretty good at making big things into small things, and cleaning up the details later with a more refined tool is the way to go.

Yes, but not because of this, but because holding individual stocks is usually a bad idea.

They could take it a step further and threaten penalties for doing illegal things.

That’s not bullying. Now, if we follow them around and reply to all their comments pointing them out as someone who doesn’t follow links, maybe we’ll get somewhere.

I like they they only do email and calendar. It’s best to not keep too many eggs in the same basket, and the pricing for Proton seems to discourage that.

You can always self-host it as well.

Sometimes I need a password when I don’t have my devices with me, and logging into the Bitwarden web vault is super convenient. Also, everything is encrypted on the client, and the client is FOSS, so there’s very little risk.

You can also host your own Bitwarden server, or use an independent alternative (Vaultwarden).

Bitwarden provides a lot of convenience without much compromise.

Ollama makes it pretty easy, and there are other runners as well. Good luck!

Nah, Congress (esp the Senate) is a bunch of old people yelling at clouds, and sometimes they yell the same thing. Don’t give them too much credit.

No, we also allow mega corporations to submit bills that get rubber stamped by a rep somewhere. I don’t think a corporation would be so audacious as to submit this, so it’s a rare case of original content.

I don’t think forced arbitration has really been tried in court. I remember Disney kind of trying, but it was completely unrelated (e.g. argued that arbitration agreement from Disney+ applied to issues on physical Disney properties).

In order to hold up in court, the contract needs to reasonably benefit both parties instead of only the contract issuer. So there’s a very good chance a court will dismiss the forced arbitration clause, especially if it’s just in a EULA and not a bidirectional contract negotiation.

That said, I tend to avoid services with binding arbitration statements in their EULA, and if I can’t, I avoid companies that force acceptance of EULA changes to continue use of the service.

I also like browsing folders of data, which makes backups easy. I only use volumes for sharing incidental data between containers (e.g. certificates before I switched to Caddy, or build pipelines for my coding projects).

Use volumes if you don’t care about the data long term, but you may need to share it with other containers. Otherwise, or if in doubt, use bind mounts.

facebook

That’s a no from me dawg.

Yup: \<[xX]\> should do it, or whatever your regex engine’s word break character is (sometimes \b).

And no lube.

I give him about… 0% chance, with some pretty tight error bars.

The only way I see Musk eking out a win is if somehow those advertisers violated the contract terms by ending their business relationship, which would be incredibly surprising.

Nobody wants either side to actually win, we’ll root for whoever is currently more messed up hoping they’ll make a comeback and prolong the fight.

Cool, see y’all in jail.

Eh, it’s just virtue signaling nonsense. It’s not going anywhere.