smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoThe HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementationwww.gamingonlinux.comexternal-linkmessage-square146fedilinkarrow-up1839arrow-down110
arrow-up1829arrow-down1external-linkThe HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementationwww.gamingonlinux.comsmileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square146fedilink
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up123arrow-down1·1 year agoWe cannot have two standards, that’s ridiculous! We need to develop one universal standard that covers everyone’s use cases.
minus-squareSlopppyEngineer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up129arrow-down3·edit-21 year agoThere are now three competing standards. https://xkcd.com/927/
minus-squarebaropithecus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up41arrow-down2·1 year agoI know what you are referencing, but displayport already covers everybody’s use cases
minus-squareThunderbird4@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-21 year agoI’ll just pull it up on this display that’s more than 9 feet away from the source…
minus-squarepewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 year ago#switchtodisplayport
minus-squareTattorack@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·1 year agoYes, I agree. And it needs to be open bloody source!!
We cannot have two standards, that’s ridiculous! We need to develop one universal standard that covers everyone’s use cases.
There are now three competing standards.
https://xkcd.com/927/
I know what you are referencing, but displayport already covers everybody’s use cases
Oh? Let me CEC on that…
I’ll just pull it up on this display that’s more than 9 feet away from the source…
#switchtodisplayport
Yes, I agree. And it needs to be open bloody source!!