Does the reddit style format inherently make for a toxic environment? Or is it a culture of toxicity from the influx of reditors? For lack of a beter example, on stackoverflow, when someone down votes you, it comes with a comment saying how to improve. On mastodon, people can’t downvote you. These platforms are a joy to use, lemmy is depressing if you post. Its depressing because every post or comment, no mater the quality comes with downvotes, and usually no criticism to accompany it, you are left not knowing if youve made a mistake, or if its just trolls, bots, or idiots. At the end you feel insulted not improved. What do you think?

  • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Just post what you want to post and ignore the votes. A few downvotes is to be expected. Try not to read into them so much.

  • CAPSLOCKFTW@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 years ago

    Mastodon was very depressing for me, this follower centric self presentation stuff is super not my style, it don’t want it to be about me, I most likely suck but I say smart things some times, so I want it to be about the stuff I say.

    Plus I don’t mind being downvoted into oblivion. I actually think that this can be a good thing. It means that there was something at least controversial about what I posted so I might be wrong or have to argue better.

    Lastly, mastodon is too much safe space and filter bubble. I want to read things from people that I disagree with and I want to argue with them in good faith. When I tried this on mastodon, I got misquoted, blocked, harassed… You name it.

  • alianne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    This sparks a few different thoughts for me:

    1. I believe there are a few Lemmy instances that don’t have downvotes enabled. (Beehaw might be one of them, but don’t quote me on that.) If downvotes are a stress point for you, you could try joining one of those instances.
    2. I personally find both upvotes and downvotes to be useful as a way for me to quickly see the community’s reaction to a piece of content. If I’m scrolling through my feed and see a post with many downvotes and few upvotes, for example, I know that post is unlikely to interest me and will move on. Conversely, a highly upvoted post or one with a mix of both upvotes and downvotes is more likely to have a good conversation in the comments in my experience.
    3. If I make a post that receives a large number of downvotes - or if most of my posts tend to be downvoted - that’s a signal to me that I’m either not communicating my message well (confusing, passive aggressive, etc.) or that my message itself may not be welcome (hate speech, misinformation, etc.). In either case, I use that as a mental trigger for me to reflect on my posts rather than a reason to become unhappy with the community/platform as a whole.
    • MiloSquirrel@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      I would also add that getting a post mass downvoted can be a sign that a community might not be a good fit for you.

      Like, using reddit as an example, if you see someone spreading anti-lgbt hate and getting upvoted, but when you try to be like “Hey that’s not cool” or explain why they’re wrong you get massively downvoted, it can be a really good sign that maybe it’s not a great place.

      • alianne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        I agree, and I would extend this thought to also include situations where it’s simply the wrong audience for your post. The content itself may not have anything wrong with it, but if you post a casual joke or comment without much depth in a community that’s built on deep conversations and well thought out replies, for example, you’re likely to be downvoted simply because the context wasn’t appropriate.

  • alaxitoo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 years ago

    I barely posted on Reddit due to the thought of people hating what I said or posted 😊 I think here is more friendly since it’s not huge, I share what I like and if people don’t agree that’s cool! As long as it makes someone happy it’s worth it ✨

  • Scooter411@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m not trying to be negative here with you - but anyone complaining about downvoted will often get another downvote from me. Say what you want to say, stand by your convictions, and don’t worry about what the internet thinks about that.

    • Crackhappy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I upvote anyone who disagrees with me, as long as they’re not a complete brute about it.

    • Joe_0237@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m not upset of complaining, I’m observing and philosophizing, this has been an intellectual pursuit, thanks for the reply

    • saddlebag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I don’t see the poster explicitly complaining about getting downvoted. How I read it is that they think that downvoting encourages people to be negative and weaponise their downvote. And, given what you’ve said, they’re spot on and you inadvertently proved their point.

      • Scooter411@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        I saw the post more as someone who is too worried about what the group will think of their comment to allow for dissent.

        That being said, what I meant about people who complain about downvotes was the old Reddit trope of “edit: really? Downvote me for asking a question?” On a comment less than an hour old.

  • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    For lack of a beter example, on stackoverflow, when someone down votes you, it comes with a comment saying how to improve. … These platforms are a joy to use

    I don’t know what part of the internet you are from, but where I am from, Stackoverflow is looked down on as the quintessential example of toxic behaviour.

    I’ve found some of the most dismissive people in tiny stack exchange groups, and experienced similar unexplained downvotes.

    What SO, Reddit, and Lemmy maybe all have in common I think, is people tend to agree or disagree based on their convictions, as opposed to agreeing or disagreeing as a means of interaction.

    I guess this puts the conflict and disagreement front and center. But at least then I know where people stand.

    Perhaps it’s important to not take opinions too personally, and remember that incencere agreement has its own problems.

    • Joe_0237@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I disagree about SO, though I am not a fan of it for other reasons. Interesting thought about acting on convictions. Thanks.

  • slimsalm@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    Imo, downvotes is just a disagreement. Being offended by it sounds like a “you” problem, we all have to deal with it.

    Upvotes normally give me answers I need for at that moment. Downvotes makes me reassess myself.

    I dont think you must read to much into the downvotes. Understand the situation why people might have downvoted you, understand why other people get upvoted, assess the situation. And most of all, understand that not everybody will always agree with you

    • Joe_0237@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      What? people wont agree with me? LIES! (<-- that is a joke). I’m not offended, and i agree, i here, am a truth seeker looking for insight, thanks!

  • Barbacamanitu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    I would always cringe so hard whenever I saw someone on reddit talking about downvotes, lack of upvotes, or karma at all. It’s silly. Quit worrying about it.

    Don’t change the way you express yourself just to make yourself more acceptable to the internet hivemind. The internet is a toxic place. Lots of people simply find joy in anonymously hurting others. Just comment and move on. And maybe reply to comments that are made in good faith.

  • Widowmaker_Best_Girl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    People on Lemmy try to rationalize that they’ll use the downvote as intended (off topic content) but our ape brains eventually just make downvote = I don’t like said thing.

    I wish we could do away with upvotes and downvotes altogether.

  • Schwim Dandy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    As a former Redditor, I can only say that I’ve not yet begun looking at votes. Why do you determine the value of your post based on that? Make your post, read and respond to people who comment and have a great day.

    • Joe_0237@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      That is the trap, isnt it. Votes are an awful metric for approval, and approval inst always needed.

  • FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    IDK, I think most of the toxicity comes from when something gets popular. I never read much into the votes on reddit because it’s usually more influenced by when you post than what you post. If you combined all the karma of my accounts it’d probably be in the millions but mostly I was just trying to either help people or make them laugh, never cared much about the points.

  • Dudewitbow@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Not necessarily toxicity, but echo chambers. Echo chambers could then be used to be toxic.

    • Joe_0237@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      At least here in the free world we have to manually build echo chambers and “The Algorithm” does not build them around us without our consent.

  • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    I think that the current downvote system is far from ideal, and ideally there should have some piece of “forced” feedback when you downvote someone, but keep in mind that a downvote is just “this should be less visible”. For example, people often downvote OK answers because an even better answer popped up, and they want the later to rise to the top. So a lot of times there’s no actual hostility in the downvotes.

    And for other Reddit behaviours that people often call toxic (I call them SNOO - stupid, noisy, obnoxious, obtuse), I think that it’s cultural. The Reddit admins bred that behaviour into the users; and users are likely to carry it with them elsewhere, including Lemmy. I think that most of those individuals will get better over time here, and the ones who don’t will end leaving.

    • MiloSquirrel@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I feel like the issue with forced feedback when you downvote is you’ll get a lot of comments where its just 1-2 words, doesn’t say much, just a “No” or “Bad”. And if you require a min characters like the bneg forums you’ll just get “No. 10chars”

      Requiring comments will cause people to half ass it at best, I think. Which, sure then people can downvote them, but are people going to write a well thought out comment for every “No”?

      Is having 40 “I disagree” comments really better for discussion than just 40 downvotes?

      • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        By “forced feedback” I was thinking more like having multiple types of downvote (“off-topic”, “rude”, “incorrect”, “I disagree”, “unfunny”…), so users need to pick one when downvoting something. It gives people a better clue on why a certain piece of content is being downvoted than just letting them assume, and it’s way less noise than 40 “I disagree” comments.

        • MiloSquirrel@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I could see that then, kinda like how you can react with different emoji on facebook.

          Idk if I’d prefer it, but I think it could work

    • Joe_0237@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Thats pretty much what i was thinking. Also SNOO seems like a useful thing to have in the brain