Is Musk competing with Zuck for the worst branding ever?

  • Vaggumon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    The simple answer: Elon Musk is a whole lot stupider then he was given credit for.

  • NoisyOne57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Musk previously owned an online banking site known as x.com, which would later merge with PayPal, another service founded by Musk, which then became a separate entity with Musk no longer being involved it.

    And when Musk was forced to complete the purchase of Twitter, he announced plans to make Twitter into a “Super app” like China’s WeChat application, which can be used for payments.

    Musk’s hyperfocus on X might also be because when he was in his twenties, everything “cool” was having an X in it, like XForce and stuff like that.

    He also wanted to create his X Corp company to have a single X as its name, but he couldn’t do that because there was an Alphabet company already using that name.

  • palebluethought@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 years ago

    Can we also talk about how absurd that picture at the bottom of the login page is? It looks like something a warez site would have as its landing page in like 2003. Made by some guy named xXx_l33tz3r0_xXx

  • Maharashtra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 years ago

    Just Elon Eloning his Elonism to Eloning levels.

    More seriously: Elon decided it’s a good move to rebrand his new toy. Nobody knows for sure what’s going through his head. It’s probably some sort of OCD, or something…

  • ButtholeAnnihilator@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    Elon can never let perceived slights go, like the Thai cave rescuer thing. He wanted PayPal to be called X and lost, now he’s rebuilding it 20 years later.

    • Captain Poofter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      One of the most recognizeable brands from the past 20 years is suddenly changing it’s branding and throwing all that recognition into the trash. I don’t know why people keep acting like this isn’t worth talking about. I don’t give two shits about musk or Twitter and don’t even have Twitter accounts or whatever, but even I recognize this is a noteworthy change (and his reasons for doing it) for the world.

      • Domille@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        I actually do wonder whether he is trying to destroy it on purpose. Every step he’s taken is perplexing if he wanted the platform to actually succeed. Of course it is also possible he is just very very stupid.

        • DrPop@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 years ago

          I believe he wants to feel like he created this platform all by himself. He buys platforms and makes them his own. This is just him trying to make Twitter more his own. Ego

  • CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Part of me wonders if it’s an attempt to tank the SEO, so people can’t search for or news or easily talk about the site anymore - because it’s been nothing but bad.

  • magic_lobster_party@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Meta’s rebranding at least makes sense. The company has been more than Facebook for a long time, so collecting everything under a different umbrella isn’t too far fetched. Facebook still exists as a product, so they haven’t thrown away all the brand value. Google did kind of the same with Alphabet.

    Rebranding Twitter to X doesn’t make sense at all.