Samsung sees 95% drop in profits for a second consecutive quarter::Today, Samsung posted its Q2 2023 financial results. The report says Samsung’s profits have dropped considerably compared to last year.

  • Polar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Sorry. I’m just trying not to get evicted due to living in a country with the highest rent, internet, food, and data plan prices.

      • Polar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Government. Not liberals or conservatives, but the government as a whole. Canada has had many years where both liberal and conservatives were in charge, and nothing changed.

        Canada doesn’t allow competition. We have 3 main internet providers, 3 main phone plan providers, like 2 grocery store chains, a couple airlines, etc.

        When other companies attempt to come in to break up monopolies, they lobby, and get them shut down.

        I mean where are we going to go? America isn’t really an alternative, as much as Americans think it is. Our healthcare, gun laws, etc are things that make Canada really good. We could move to some European or Scandinavian country, but that’s not as easy as it sounds, especially when you need to learn a new language, get accepted, move your entire life, and live in such a different culture.

        So people in Canada just accept it. Maybe one day monopolies will be broken up, but there are no parties that are going to do that now. Left or right leaning.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Government. Not liberals or conservatives, but the government as a whole. Canada has had many years where both liberal and conservatives were in charge, and nothing changed.

          Huh, it’s almost as if they don’t encompass as much of the political spectrum as they’d like us to believe.

            • steveman_ha@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Capitalism and free markets are separate things within the economic “sphere” of society. Capitalism is an economic doctrine that focuses on directing production through private capital; free markets (in theory) ensure “equal access” to markets for products (as compared to monopoly or (economic, not necessarily drug) cartel markets which restrict access).

              Over in the “public sphere”, governments decide whether to jump in bed with private capital (often resulting in monopolies or cartels in economic marketplacs), or to make & enforce regulations that protect the (so-called) free market.

              Or to make and enforce regulations that protect consumers – i.e. human f-ing beings – and enrich local economies without protectionism and “zero sum games”, but I guess we shouldn’t get too carried away here ;)

        • Bondrewd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          I haven’t even seen a North American have a kind of acceptable political understanding in the 2020s until now.

    • Wooki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      At least you don’t live in the city with the highest rent prices. Our countries treated housing like and investment scheme which drives up local tax revenue resulting in reduction year in year of new developments (assuming Canada has the same supply Constraints as here) . The reduction is fueled by the tax revenue however also by the increasing amount of investors and owners who vote. They don’t want their asset values to decrease so it’s artificially kept high the value component of the assets left long ago, we are in fictional valuations now.

      Regarding food, their is no other way around monopoly or duopoly other than supporting farmers markets. By supporting them they can grow their base and bring down prices. Not sure what else can be done here. It’s a real problem for us here.

      Electricity prices are skyrocketing here and that’s squarely landed at the feet of poor renewables planning. Mandatory coal plant shutdowns without having replacement capacity in place is killing people when the elderly & vulnerable can’t afford AC during the heat waves.

  • dgilluly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again.

    This is a sign of an upcoming recession if we aren’t already in one. People are starting to run out of their savings due to stagflation and are looking for areas to cut. Buying a new phone every year or every other year and replacing laptops every 5 years are among the first things to go in anyone’s budget.

    So currently the only people refreshing their devices are the people who NEED new devices.

    Capitalist economies always need spends out of desire and not just necessity.

    Worst part is instead of reversing the gouging these companies will probably just go ham on the planned obsolescence.

    • Myrbolg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      2 years ago

      Or simply that prices have become insane. Good phones used to be around 400, taking me a few days to think about it and say yes. Now they are beyond 1000, so I will do my best to avoid having to upgrade and go with custom ROMs again. In the meanwhile, we also lost exchangeable batteries, external SD cards, and microphone jack, and we gained more Google spyware and bloat.

      • uberkalden@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Good phones are still $400. They just have this ridiculous tier now that is even higher

        • Neflubaguzzi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          I had a Pixel 3a for years. It was a great phone and it was $350. Eventually it stopped getting updates :(

      • Pofski@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I bought a m52 a while ago on a black friday promotion or something like that for 280. It’s the most expensive phone I ever bought (usially i try to stay under 200). I know that for some that is peanuts, but I have it hard to justify spending so much money on a phone. 1000 for a phone is something I would never be able to do. The thing I do like about it is the quality of the photos and the ease to connect with my wireless buds.

      • dgilluly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Good phones used to be around 400, taking me a few days to think about it and say yes. Now they are beyond 1000

        I’m not sure what you mean by a “good” phone. Like yeah, they came up a bit. A Pixel 7a costs $499, and if one wants wireless charging and a better camera they can go with the Pixel 7 for $599. Regular non-Pro iPhones are around the same price.

        Like yeah, folding phones are well over $1,000 in most cases, but personally I think that’s a gimmick, my hot take. But for me and 99% of the people I know, we’re sticking with our slab smartphones.

    • Oneobi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 years ago

      The gouging is insane. £300+ for a tablet keyboard case for the s9 ultra.

      I got one free as a preorder for the s8 ultra. No chance I am paying that much for a keyboard.

      • Sheltac@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        Even my iPad keyboard (the folio from Apple) “only” cost like £180. Samsung’s going nuts.

      • dgilluly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Samsung isn’t on planet earth with their prices. I was avoiding them anyway because I believe TouchWiz is an inferior interface than stock Android. Just way too much bloat.

        • Oneobi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Bloat is negligible. In fact it is their software that keeps me stuck with samsung. Its a total superior hardware and software experience.

          Just wished they hadn’t gone down the Apple courage route and bumped the price and pimped the features.

          • dgilluly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            You’re the only one I’ve heard of who was happy with it. One of the guys I worked with, traded a new at the time Galaxy S-series phone back into his carrier to exchange for an iPhone because it was very laggy. After seeing one in action I didn’t blame him. It was laggier than my cheap Moto G series, which had a lot less processing power and slower storage. And this was back in 2017, so not too awfully long ago. But maybe things have changed since then.

            • Oneobi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              2017 was a long time ago.

              Like with everything you need to invest time to learn the features. If you just want a phone with basic capabilities then you are better off getting other brands.

              The spen itself is packed with so many features but rarely does anyone bother learning them. Samsung have developed a powerhouse for productivity and unfortunately that means I’m stuck with them because nothing else compares.

              Everyone is on their own journey and I agree that it is not for everyone.

              • dgilluly@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                Part of my job still is to help people connect their work email to their personal smartphones, if they want to. Many buy Samsungs because their carrier’s store still sells them up front compared to other brands of Android. Though it’s mostly A-series phones.

                The problem with it is that Samsung doesn’t put the access to the features in convenient or intuitive locations so many users just get used to not using them anyway. The only feature, I as a Pixel user envy over Samsung is the right side menu thing. But anyone with iPhone experience or experience using an Android that has gesture nav enabled by default, wouldn’t think to try it even with the spen because that is the gesture to go back.

                Ofc Pixels can do multitask yet many don’t realize that because you have to click the app icons at the top of the recent apps screen to access the menu for it. So I guess I don’t have room to talk about that aspect as a Pixel user.

                But Bixby? I honestly think it’s a waste of resources for Samsung when they could have just used Google Assistant like other brands. I mean Bixby is okay but still lacks in some areas, but Samsung invested a lot of resources and effort into it just to come up with something that barely keeps up with Google’s Assistant.

                Also I’m not a huge fan of their app drawer still. I guess I’m more of a “I just want to see an alphabetical list of all apps” on the app drawer type of person.

    • blarco@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      You hit the nail on the head for me. I loved my Galaxy S9+ but it was over 4 years old and literally falling apart. I just replaced it with an S23…but also as others have said, I think the S9+ was better. I’m especially having issues with the camera (look up bananagate) and my old car doesn’t have Bluetooth so I have a USB C to Aux adapter that randomly cuts out sound so for a lot of drives I just put the sound up on my phone speakers and play directly.

      • Nighed@sffa.community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I got a cigarette lighter usb port to provide power to a Bluetooth -> aux dongle. Works well.

    • 5BC2E7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I remember reading vague claims that this was expected by samsung and it was just the cost of something they did some years ago to eliminate competition. Unfortunately I don’t have anything more concrete but someone else might know and add a comment.

      • dgilluly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Tbh, might not be a bad time to do it as long as you don’t sink yourself into debt too much or have to take out high interest loans. Because if the crash happens while you’re studying and by the time you graduate things might start recovering again. I guess we’ll see.

  • pizzazz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Drops in profits can mean investments, new hires and a myriad of other stuff. No meaning in the headline whatsoever. Profits are not revenue.

  • YaksDC@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Foldable devices seem like the 3d TVs of the last couple of years. I will not be getting one any time soon.

    • BrooklynMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      and who even wants this? a couple of friends have them, and it seems like nothing more than a weird novelty. in sci-fi, the phone unfolds to become a tablet, not folds in half to become… uselelss while potentially damaging the screen for no good reason.

      this is a classic example of one of those technologies that you think would be cool, but once you have it, you’re like, “eh, never mind.” but Samsung went all sunk cost fallacy and doubled-down on it, losing billions. brilliant!

      • Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’d love to have one but they’re overpriced.

        Same with every flagship, the tech isn’t scaring me off just that the price is ridiculous to me. A new phone case, wallpaper and launcher and I’ll get another year out of any phone.

      • pqdinfo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Removed as a protest against the community’s support for campaigns to bring about the deaths of members of marginalized groups, and opposition to private entities working to prevent such campaigns, together with it’s mindless flaming and downvoting of anyone who disagrees.

        • BrooklynMan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 years ago

          from what my friends have told me, that novelty wears off real quick, and is replaced with the concern it will break or wear out— which happens more frequently than manufacturers claim. if not the screen itself, then the hinges, which were a common problem with the old flip-phones, too, back in the day.

          I mean, you like what you like. I’m just speaking from a practical standpoint in that any moving parts = a high manufacturing cost and higher rate of defect and breakage. the primary advantage of the “candy bar” form factor is that it reduces/eliminates moving parts and potential points of failure from the physical design.

          I admit… I really do miss the idea, even the feel of flipping a phone shut. hell, I even miss slamming a phone down to end a call. angrily jamming my finger into a screen to end a call is REALLY unsatisfying, and often ends in my throwing my phone across the room, and I’ve thankfully developed the habit of throwing it at my couch to save on replacing expensive smartphones, lol. but, until tech evolves tot he point where we get phablets a la Westworld or Legion that can unfold into a super-slim tablet rather than fold down into a flip-phone from the past whose screen could actually just break at any moment because the tech was rushed…. yeah, I’m not interested.

          • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 years ago

            I had a Motorola razr in 2021 that was a good phone, the crease never really bothered me but after 6 months of use the touch screen stopped working and then the pixels started going out on it before it stopped working entirely.

            I loved the form factor but it’s just not reliable enough. I’d probably only buy another clamshell foldable if apple made it because I trust them not to rush a half baked product to market.

          • pqdinfo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Removed as a protest against the community’s support for campaigns to bring about the deaths of members of marginalized groups, and opposition to private entities working to prevent such campaigns, together with it’s mindless flaming and downvoting of anyone who disagrees.

          • moup@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            I was going to say I miss slam-shutting my flip phone too but have realized that I only talk on the phone like 3 times a week so I wouldn’t be getting a foldable just for that

    • Wreckronomicon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      I see why you’re saying that but I love my fold and I don’t think I could go back to a regular phone anymore, you quickly get used to the screen real estate and its difficult to give it up imo. While the outside screen is too thin on my fold for my fat fingers you get the best of both worlds of a phone and a more portable tablet, I get it if its not your thing but I find it very handy to have that extra work space on my phone.

      • Bakachu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m in the same boat with my foldable. It’d be a handicap now to watch videos on a smaller screen now that I’ve gotten used to the bigger one. I only use the small screen for phone calls now because it’s awkward holding the large screen to your face for that.

      • TitanLaGrange@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        While the outside screen is too thin on my fold

        Yep, I’m hoping they’ll do a slightly wider tri-fold model at some point. I’d like to have a wider front screen, like Galaxy S22 Ultra sized, and then be able to unfold twice to get a ~3x sized tablet-sized screen.

        Not that that would help with the already astronomical price-tag of the Z-Fold.

  • kingshrubb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Maybe they could stop taking features away from their phones. Put a micro SD and aux jack back and I’d buy one

        • LUHG@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yeh it’s expensive but I vote with my wallet. Sony’s build is the best I’ve ever had. Software is close to stock AOSP with nice Sony improvements. Only issue I see is Sony are slow to roll out major OS updates. All in all, I’d argue it’s one of the best devices I’ve had over the last few generations.

    • Alchemy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Maybe I am in the minority but I’ll never need an aux jack again and I see it as another point of failure for water damage.

      • krayj@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Maybe I am in the minority but I’ll never need an aux jack again

        There is still significant lag for bluetooth audio on both ios and android platforms. It’s doesn’t really impact calling, and it doesn’t really impact watching video content (because they figured out how to measure that latency in real time and inject artificial delay into the video stream so that audio and video sync). But what they haven’t figured out yet is the answer for bluetooth audio for gaming. When gaming, you can’t arbitrarily delay the video feed so that it lines up with audio, so the bluetooth audio experience is complete dogshit for any gaming scenario. If you game, you have to use the physical cable or the constant audio lag will drive you mad.

        Also, there used to be (still are) a fair number of accessories designed to work through the aux port. Examples: mobile credit card readers that connect through aux jack (like square/paypal) that are used heavily by small vendors (especially for shows/events); also things like selfie sticks that use a cable plugged into the aux jack connected to a length of wire running inside the selfie stick to a button on the end of it.

        The market is starting to come up with wireless versions of these things, but the modern wireless versions now require unique ios and android versions of them when the aux-jack solution used to be platform independent.

        Also, the audio quality of an aux jack is an order of magnitude superior to anything that can be piped through bluetooth…still.

        I very much appreciate devices still throwing traditional aux jacks onto mobile devices. Ideally, there will be a wireless technical solution that eventually is superior, but that technology is definitely not bluetooth and we’re still waiting for it to be invented and hit consumer availability.

        • hypnotoad@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Would love to read more about the Bluetooth lag. Does it affect Bluetooth dac’s like the fiio btr5 as well?

        • Thadrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Almost all of those are pretty niche problems though. Which explains why they just aren’t a high priority for manufacturers.

  • Amilo159@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    As a Samsung user of 6 years, mainly due to job phone policy, I say they deserve it.

    Great screens, but gawddamn they aren’t worth their price. No charger, no headphone jack, no expandable storage, fingerprint sensor that are iffy and damn OS taking up 30% of your storage, no matter which option you go for.

    I like the camera and s-pen on my S22u but that’s it. They need to lower price and make competent mid range phones again, like the A52s.

    • 99nights@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      But you can say this about any phone company these days (besides Sony, they still have it all) or you can blame them for taking the ‘apple’ direction of taking away everything and charging more.

    • Corhen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I love the spen, and never had trouble with the finger print scanner… But you nail the rest of the list.

      • Amilo159@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Fingerprint issues were my biggest complaint on Note 20, coming from S9, that was a huge let down.

          • Amilo159@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Try that with a screen protector on 20 series and you’ll see what I mean. With other brands using optical sensor, you don’t need to worry about it at all.

            • Corhen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              I have a screen protector on my s22u, without a problem.

              As I said, maybe I’m just lucky. /Shrug.

              • Amilo159@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                Which kind? One that fully adhere to screen or the kind with glue on edges and circular area near sensor?

  • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    They still made around $1/2 BILLION.

    I love how every headline about their earnings focuses on the drop from before and not on the actual number they made.

    Boo-fucken-hoo the record profits they were making the last few years couldn’t be sustained forever. Oh noes!1!!!

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      Dude a 95% drop in profits YOY is most assuredly newsworthy

      • ryannathans@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Maybe if it was revenue. Such a drop in profits could be from many ordinary business operations like expansion

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          It states in the article that it is from less than expected sales, no?

      • ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        2 years ago

        No. Not at all.

        If a company made one penny last quarter, and 10,000,000 this quarter, then their profit is up 10 billion percent. It’s a stupid headline.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Is it your belief that Samsung made hundreds of billions of dollars mysteriously in on huge surge?

          • ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Revenue matters more since companies tend to invest in future technology. Most serious business analysts would never talk about profit in percentages. This is clickbait. Hence why the stock price (determined by investors not Reddit tech refugees) is not suffering.

        • SuperStonker@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          If a company did that it would be extremely newsworthy, as a 1,000,000,000,000x profit increase.

          I don’t see your point.

          If the same company made 10,000,000 last quarter and then made 500,000 this quarter that would also be newsworthy… as you know, a 95% drop in profits.

          • ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            “Company so and so did an INFINITE PROFIT INCREASE!”

            Stupid.

            My point is that it’s stupid to use percentages when reporting profits unless you’re writing for clicks. That’s not how professional do it when looking at earnings reports. Ever. And for good reason. Again, Samsung stock is not tanking, because investors are smarter than internet kids who are bad with numbers.

            Revenues are looked at as percentages. Profits are looked at as raw numbers. Typically.

            Relevant username btw hahaha

            • SuperStonker@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              😳I really didn’t mean to upset you so much wee man… don’t get too emotional. Just having a conversation here aren’t we?

              Percentage is entirely legitimate to look at, it’s merely a way of quantifying what the raw numbers mean versus the raw numbers from last years performance.

              No one said Samsung stock is tanking, you’re kind of shouting that into an empty room.

              I was acknowledging that a 95% drop in profits vs the same period over the previous year is definitely a newsworthy item especially in two consecutive quarters… I think any shareholder of Samsung would agree.

              • ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                Company makes 1 dollar q1 2022. Company makes $.05. Q2 of 2023.

                Headline: “company loses 95% of its profits.”

                It’s the opposite of meaningful.

                • SuperStonker@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  It is meaningful if you measure Q1 2020 vs Q1 2021. You’ve got a bit confused as to what YOY is, you’re not just measuring two random quarters from different years (q1 2022 vs q2 2023?), you’re comparing against the performance in the same quarter the previous year.

                  It is a very meaningful way of judging whether a companies performance (ability to turn a profit and create value for the investor) has improved against the same period the previous year.

                  https://www.investopedia.com/terms/y/year-over-year.asp

                  There is a little bit of very basic information for you. I can try find something more colourful and with nice pictures if you need.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 years ago

    And remember, nobody is actually losing money, they just aren’t making as much as they’d hoped. You make shitty products and you homogenized with Apple losing anything that made you distinct and close to worthwhile. Fuck Samsung, all my homies hate Samsung.

    • lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      I was so happy when they released those commercials with their commitment to the headphone jack after Apple abandoned it.

      After they dropped it, they made sure I’ll never buy another phone from them. They probably don’t care. They probably make more than enough through their bluetooth headphones.

        • kalleboo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 years ago

          Sales are “only” down 37%, it’s profits that are down 95%. Which means either they’ve had to discount their phones, or they’re not selling enough volume to make up for R&D.

  • profdc9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yeah, this is the chaebol system at work. The Faustian deal between these megacorps and the citizens of South Korea means that it is impossible for Samsung to fail or to be accountable for their bad business decisions. South Korea is the most developed cyberpunk technofeudalistic society.

  • Hapa_B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Lol everyone commenting it’s because THEY don’t want to buy a new phone. Samsung supplies screens, electronic internals for other companies, and a fuck ton of appliances. They don’t only make phones…

    • Balder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yet the article says Samsung attributes that to the phones market?

      Samsung attributes this loss in profit to the decline in smartphone shipments due to “high interest rates and inflation.”

      Something else that doesn’t seem to bode well is the fact that Samsung believes the boost that came from the launch of the Galaxy S23 series has faded.

      And expects a comeback because it’s launching new models…

      The manufacturer highlights the launch of the Galaxy Z Flip 5 and Galaxy Z Fold 5. It also believes that the smartphone market will make a return.

      This seems to indicate that most variable profit comes from the smartphones market.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      I was just in a vacation rental looking at a Samsung mini-split AC and wondering if it was good or not haha.

      • ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Their washing machines and dryers aren’t great compared to LG, so I would be suspicious of their ACs.

        • Hyperi0n@lemmy.film
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Samsung and LG are both garbage when it comes to washers, dryers and the worst for refrigerators.

            • Hyperi0n@lemmy.film
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              Consumer Reports isn’t a valid source. They have paid reports.

              Speed Queen is the top brand in washers and dryers.

              LG dryers do not last past their warranty for very long. Anyone who’s owned an LG can tell you that as with appliance repair companies.

              LG and Samsung are very poor.

              • ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                Consumer Reports isn’t a valid source. They have paid reports

                Do you have a source for that? That would be a pretty big deal considering they’re a non-profit that claims to accept no samples and no advertising.

                • Hyperi0n@lemmy.film
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  PeTA claims is doesn’t fund terrorism. Yet they do. They were blacklisted from Walmart donations when I worked there for that sole reason.

    • marmo7ade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      They don’t make OLED TVs. LG supplies samsung with the OLED panels for their TVs.

      For everything samsung does, they can’t do the hard things. They can’t make OLED panels, they can’t make SoCs like Apple, and they can’t make software like Google.

      Samsung does a ton of things…mid. That’s why they supply so many parts. Because the really difficult and innovative things are done by the people they sell parts to.

  • jacktherippah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I stopped buying Samsung when they started with the Knox bullshit. I saw it as an anti-consumer move.

  • Macropolis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Samsung sucks and most corporations in tech have horrible practices. At least the big ones. Profits over people is there motive. Tech should be human friendly