• Darkwatch00 @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    125
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    The MPAA really is grasping for straws aren’t they. Ever since people were able to stream movies during the pandemic and found it was a much cheaper more enjoyable experience, they have been trying to invent ways to drive people back to the theaters. Now they are suffering major block buster busts and they have to point the finger at someone so they think, “it’s those darn Reddit pirates!” Its funny that they don’t realize they caused their own demise. But really I wonder, why specifically 2011?

    • ledditor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Right? Yeah, piracy is the reason people don’t go to the movies. It has nothing to do with the overpriced, nasty concessions (cold, overly salty popcorn), dirty floors, uncomfortable “reclining” seats, gimmicks (4DX, RPX, XD), staff that can’t be bothered to turn off the lights at showtime or properly configure the sound systems. All while you’re paying $15 per ticket and $30 on snacks.

      These morons live in an entirely different world.

      • illyria817@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s funny because we subscribe to the AMC A-List and go to the movies quite a bit (obviously this is in the US). But it’s because a) we have a couple of AMC theatres close by, and b) it’s just me and my spouse, no kids involved. So it’s something that to us is worthwhile (having a night out a few times a months to see a movie on the big screen). Also, we never buy concessions. I can’t imagine how an average family with a bunch of kids can just go and drop over 100 bucks on tickets and concessions on any given night.

      • ɢᴜᴍᴅʀᴏᴘʙᴜɴɴɪᴇꜱ@lib.lgbt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Not to mention the comparison between watching a movie at home, where you know it will be silent, versus the risk of having at least one (but often more) groups of people who will not shut the fuck up the whole time.

    • Bitswap@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Disagree that it’s more enjoyable than going to the theaters. There is a social aspect of going to movies with friend groups that’s hard to replicate at home. People don’t have space to fit 12 friends to comfortably watch a new release.

    • chaogomu@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      2011 is well outside the Statute of Limitations for infringement…

      That’s three years with some wiggle room for ongoing infringement.

      This is likely an intimidation/shakedown thing.

  • ward2k@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    In a way this does make me slightpy concerned about Lemmy servers, Reddit has a team of lawyers and tonnes of funds behind it to fight pointless demands like these

    A lot of server owners won’t and will be much easier to coax into giving up information about it’s users

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      The thing is, chasing individual instances is a game of whack-a-mole, with a lot of downside and not a lot of upside. Established companies follow laws and regulations because they are easy targets, with local assets, offices, and public figures that are worth serving/seizing and can be compelled to comply to court orders. How TF you going to enforce a court order in a country that doesn’t recognize your jurisdiction or laws?

      The other thing thing is, if you run an instance with moderation rules that skirt the law, you are incentivised not to log personal information and disseminate it because a) that makes you a target, and b) you’ll get called out by your own users for logging and leaking IPs, and people will just move to a different server.

      It seems pretty obvious to me that you should assume at all times when you are online that you are basically in a public space, like in a public cafe: People can see you, even if the fact that they are not paying close attention to you creates the illusion of privacy. If you start doing something to stand out, people will start to pay attention to you, and it’s all visible to see unless you actively take precautions to hide your identity. That starts–but doesn’t end–with not browsing piracy on main.

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Both IVPN and Mullvad have just removed port forwarding. I hear the options now are proton (which I hear may not have port forwarding on linux yet, but say they will) and AirVPN.

          • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 years ago

            While it can be abused, it can also not be abused, surprisingly enough. I don’t want a secondary cheap vpn for DOWNLOADING, I happen to SEED, you leech, and also use slsk which means I now can’t connect to anyone who also can’t forward their ports because they also use one of your cheap VPNs with no port forwarding for DOWNLOADING.

            You are condescending, have added no new info, and you’re clearly just a leech, I’m pretty done with this conversation, sorry “pal.”

  • Rhs519@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 years ago

    Well, Reddit isn’t in my good books right now, but I hope they fight this fight hard, and I hope they win. Good Luck Reddit

  • astraeus@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 years ago

    12 years ago, talking about piracy isn’t incriminating so why do the big movie companies need their info? So they can potentially intimidate them for more info they potentially don’t have?

    • Prox@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      For real. And even if they were to find the users, which is a longshot, those people could say, “no one tells the truth on the internet.”

      This fishing expedition is a waste of resources.

    • 👽🍻👽@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      Really no idea why that timeline. In 2010 I got an email from whatever ISP I was using at the time politely asking me to stop torrenting music. They basically said, hey we see you’re doing this, please stop or you can’t have internet through us anymore. That is when I learned what vpns and tor browser’s are for.

      Seems absolutely bonkers that any corporation would be digging back that far for media pirates. Absolute waste of time.

  • ???@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 years ago

    And why are they demanding it? Just scrape it like the rest of us.

  • Marauder20@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Seems this has become standard operating procedure for much of this industry - make shitty movies, wonder why they flop at the box office, then go scorched earth against alleged “pirates” and blame them for your “losses”. When the studios make movies that are worth seeing, people will go to see them. See: Top Gun Maverick and Avatar 2, among other recent multi-billion dollar hits.

    It is worth noting that many of the more egregious abuses of the legal process as of late seem to be by this one company Millennium Media and their many subsidiaries (Bodyguard Productions, HB Productions, etc.) They are basically just a bigger version of Strike 3, just professional trolls who would rather profit off of legal shakedowns than make good movies.

    • LonelyWendigo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Funny, those are the same movies I’d point to as what’s fundamentally flawed with the film industry; chasing the lowest common denominator and avoiding interesting and artful risk.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Name 10 interesting and artful films and you’ll have also named 9 box office bombs. Hell, Fight Club didn’t even gross half it’s budget at the box office. Very few people want good films.

  • LeHappStick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 years ago

    Thank goodness I only openly supported piracy from 2019 to 2023 with 5 different accounts lmao

    Dodged a bullet there

  • deCorp0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    Imagine when film companies pay Google for access to pirate’s gmail registrations. I’m glad I switched to Protonmail years ago. Any of these “free” services will sell your information for the right price.

  • dottedgreenline@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    Piracy is part and parcel of the global economic system, and since that system hasn’t changed since time immemorial, well it always has been too.