These comment removals don’t appear on the modlog but the likely culprit comment is

“It fucking matters that the lemmy main code contributors are Tankie scum. The less power they exert over the whole, the better.”

At a 3 to 2 score, but also includes such heinous comments as

"You can just browse lemmy in a mobile browser like waterfox just fine…

Why would anybody want to install unnecessary third party apps? That sounds awful."

and

“I havent used many instances but I’ve never used one which didn’t have a mobile site.”

The Modlog does mention the ban with the following reason:

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Mate, in my country the liberal party are the fash. Pull your head out of your bum.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        The concept of liberalism doesn’t equate to your specific country’s liberal party, just as the Republican party of the USA don’t support a representative democracy, the People’s Republic of North Korea isn’t a republic and does not belong to the people, and the Chinese Communist Party isn’t owned by the workers.

    • kuato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Liberalism and fascism have more in common than you think, which is why socialists often say, “scratch a liberal and a fascist bleeds.”

      I must make two honest confessions to you, my Christian and Jewish brothers. First, I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to “order” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: “I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action”; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man’s freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a “more convenient season.” Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.
      — MLK, Jr., Letter from Birmingham Jail

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        So called socialist countries have an attrocious civil rights record, a severe lack of protections for vulnerable classes of people, if your definition of liberalism is that it isn’t socialism then you’ve truly outed yourself as a misinformed Tankie, gj comrade.

        BTW, those “white liberals” helped pass the civil rights act that MLK Jr advocated for. The USA was 88.5% white at the time of the civil rights movement, and we the entire USA as one people still passed it through an all white congress. MLK’s concerns turned out to be wrong with that letter.