• AlataOrange@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I’m going to go on a different angle on this one and say that we are much tougher on sexual harassment. I feel like a lot of people from the 1950s who have grown up on pulp sci-fi like Flash Gordon could accept a lot of modern technology and the internet as basically just magic. To be fair is how a lot of modern people also accept it. But I don’t think they would be able to process the move towards egalitarianism that we have taken.

    That is not to say that modern society is egalitarian only that we have made good strides in achieving that aim.

    Edit: Turns out Gordon is from the '70s, but other pulp sci-fi exist so my statement stands.

  • EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    “Yes, they are allowed to be on the same bus as us. No, we don’t call them that anymore”

    • jetsetdorito@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      “Bus? No we bulldozed hundreds of neighborhoods to build highways so now everyone has to have a car”

    • soviettaters@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I knew that would be the obvious joke but it’s not like that was unfathomable in the fifties. Desegregation was obviously where the world was headed and I’m sure everyone was expecting (or dreading) modern racial relations.

  • Antimutt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    That smoking is bad for them. You’d just be banging your head against their socially-acceptable-at-the-time drug addiction.

    • RCMaehl [Any]@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Person from 2020 magically appearing in 2090 and being told caffeine/excessive sugar is now regulated and ID checked

      • corroded@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’d be okay without excess sugar, but I’m a firm believer that it is virtually impossible (for me) to function in modern society without caffeine. Our bodies want to sleep when we’re tired, but I have never had a job where I could say “I’m tired. I’m going to nap and come back in 8 hours.”

        • JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          You know you can sleep at night and work during the day right?

          Also napping isn’t sleeping for 8 hours.

          You (and a lot of people tbf) need caffeine to stay awake mostly because your body gets used to it and then can’t function without it. Plenty of people do just fine without caffeine or other substances. It’s not magic and we’re not super humans or anything. We just don’t drink caffeine multiple times a day every day

          • thegreatgarbo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            I would argue those of us on a shifted circadian rhythm that lags 4 hours behind the farmer personalities in our society need caffeine to fit into the rigid corporate structure those first hours of the work day, and those high pressure professionals, VCs, high tech biotech silicon valley wall street types need caffeine (and cocaine for some lol) to function in their 17h 6-7 day work weeks (not me). I just take a caffeine break on vacations to reset my sensitivity and then slowly build up over the next 6 months to a pot of coffee all the way through before bed time to function.

          • corroded@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            I guess my point is that with work, personal obligations, family, etc, there aren’t enough hours in the day to so what needs to be done and still just sleep and wake up when you’re no longer tired.

            It’s great that it works for you, but it just never has for me. Also, to be fair, it’s been 20 years since I worked a job with a regular 9-5 schedule, so I’m admittedly biased.

      • whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        How would you regulare excessive sugar? Have a weekly quota of sugar that can be contained in food you purchase? Are they going to ban growing fruits?

        • elephantium@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Taxes on sugar beets and standards for manufactured foodstuffs, I’d assume. Chopping down the apple tree in your front yard is clearly absurd (or is it? I’m not sure what’s too absurd to happen anymore…), but saying that any loaf of bread with more than 20g of sugar must be labeled “cake” and taxed as such? That type of thing has already been happening for years.

    • electrogamerman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I read your response and immediately thought of homosexuality. That would be hard to explain, why now we have a big pride parade celebrating it. (Im gay, dont com at me!)

  • struds@sopuli.xyzB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Things they considered morally fine (smoking, dropping litter, 40 year olds dating 16 year olds) is morally reprehensible, while things they thought were morally wrong or even outlawed are totally acceptable (homosexually, porn, divorce).

  • Hypersapien@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    We walk around with a little rectangle in our pocket that gives us access to the sum total of human knowledge, but we mostly use it for looking at funny captioned pictures, the same pictures over and over just with different captions.

    It’s called a phone but no one ever uses it as one.

    • irinotecan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 years ago

      Also, the “video telephone” that everyone always so desperately awaited from the future? Yeah, we have that; no, nobody uses it, because we can’t be bothered to dress up for a phone call.

      • PassingDuchy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        I also thought no one used facetime until I worked retail recently… The amount of people I saw come in on a facetime calls where they both just had their cameras pointed at the ceiling was bizarre and boggling.

      • gmtom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        Tell that to the tonnes of people that facetious in public but neither them nor the person they are calling are actually in frame

    • FReddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      That pretty much sums it up.

      The phone never leaves my side, but I dread getting an actual phone call.

  • Blastoid5000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    #3 Why we still haven’t got colonies on the moon

    #2 Climate change

    #1 That fascism is back

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      they knew about climate change in the 50’s- actually, greenhouse gases were first proposed in the 1820s.

    • PsychedSy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      You’d think most of them are more fascist than the people you consider fascist now. Remember what England did to Alan Turing. They’d be amazed we let women and minorities work with us and we don’t persecute gays. They’d think the commies won.

  • Herrmens@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 years ago

    The Internet, social media and how we can access absolutely everything from this tiny device

    • Maharashtra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Plenty of SF writers lived in that era and they predicted the Internet.

      For example: I can name the writer and his novel where he predicted AI writing engines.

      • novibe@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 years ago

        Can you really though?

        I mean, no jokes though, why don’t you just name him instead of saying you could? Lol

        • Maharashtra@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Found it and translated the relevant section:

          So it is necessary to write something. It’s seemingly very simple - to write something. You stand in front of the conceptor, press a few keys at random and after ten seconds a slate pops up with a ready-made scheme, let’s say a novella, with developed plots, psychological character, the duration of the plot, an attractive point… Then the slate is thrown into a dialogoscript, which, having filled in the empty framework of the scheme with a record of the “verbal meat”, feeds it further, to the visionary and phonocombi… Then it is only necessary to teach the actors personalities, roles and twist it all with a copiosynchronization camera. Novelvision is ready.

          Do remember that it comes from OLD times. Certain words are archaic now, certain were invented to sound futuristic and have no good equivalent.

          …and I’d really prefer for people to come out with their own findings of similar predictions. The more the merrier.

            • Maharashtra@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              Witold Zegalski “Wyspa Petersena” (Petersen’s Island). It wasn’t translated to English, but it’s easy to find and modern online translators are quite reliable.

              The book is a compilation of short stories. 2 or 3 from them describe the vision of a future world that seems to be the direction we’re heading to. The excerpt was taken from one of them.

              • novibe@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 years ago

                Coolio, thanks! I love old sci-fi like this. Specially the crazy sciency words lol

  • OptimusPhillip@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    “You see, the file itself can be copied by anyone, but this one little piece of metadata can never be duplicated. That means you own the file.”

    • davidgro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      Also nearly everything else. Computers would be an obvious exception, a couple years ago I paid USD$40 for a smartwatch with specs exceeding a $2000 computer from around year 2000, and millions of times more powerful than computers from the 50s which cost millions of dollars at the time.

  • incognito_tuna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 years ago

    That we’ve been to the moon - in there 60s - but haven’t been back or been out further. I think it would just be against all their expectations.

    • nuachtan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      There were several places in the media that had stories of landing on the moon as a real possibility. Almost a forgone conclusion.

      • Weirdfish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 years ago

        I believe that the area of disbelief would be that we just… stopped.

        Unmanned space exploration is amazing, and we’ve done a ton in LEO, but we haven’t put a person out past the Hubble telescope since Apollo 17, which was 1972 if I remember correctly.

        • OptimusPhillip@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          “Yeah, we went there a few times, there was nothing there besides a bunch of rocks. We brought some back for study, and spent the next few decades on more obviously productive pursuits. Like putting robots on Mars!”