This user did hours over a day of violent and transphobic hate speech and was not banned due to absentee admins. And when admins finally take action it’s for “userbase request”?

Uhhhhh? Am I missing something? SDF admins don’t seem to be willing to operate a community as a community of 4k users.

No hate to the admins if they are underpaid or whatever. SDF just needs to appoint reachable and bare minimally invested admins, and if they can’t maybe shouldn’t be running a Lemmy instance; it’s not really a “set it and forget it” deal.

  • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Getting an admin response within hours sounds extremely reasonable to me, TBH. You may want to reconsider your expectations of free services, this is coming across pretty entitled.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I edited the wording to be clearer for those who haven’t been keeping up with recent PTB posts. To clarify, it was over a day.

      With that in mind, a day is absolutely a reasonable timeframe for an instance with 4,000 users to expect action—though calling it “entitlement” is a rather skewed perspective. This concerns the safety of a lot of users, who were essentially left unprotected.

      If SDF lacks the resources to maintain safety, they should at the very least disable automatic approvals for new users and communities, which, as I understand, had not been done at the time of writing this post. They should consider recruiting volunteer admins and adding Matrix contacts to the instance sidebar for urgent abuse cases like CSAM.

      Again, I have no ill will toward the team—I’m simply reporting what happened and what we should hope to see addressed moving forward.

      • phlegmy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 minutes ago

        I agree with most of your points, and they should definitely look into getting more active moderators on their instance.

        But I’m not sure I understand what you mean by safety?
        They took less than 2 days, but the way you word it sounds like someone was going to die because the ‘content’ was up for more than 24 hours?

        Idk, this whole thing just feels like an over-exaggerated response to something that could have been handled with a simple report.

        • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 minutes ago

          someone else pointed out that my tone in the original post is a little more pointed than perhaps i intended and i think that is fair.

          im really just here to report and keep folks in the loop on the subject.

    • jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      This took over a day. My whole concern was that it was very bad and was making the org behind the instance look horrible.

  • jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    We spammed all communication channels to wake the admin up. Just a bit ago, the troll activated again with and the admin was ontop of it within the hour

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I’m glad they are at least reachable again. I hope they can at least find a handful of admin volunteers to cover user safety concerns across time zones. That should absolutely be possible out of 4,000 users but definitely needs to be done.

      Honestly makes me proud of my instance which has 500 users but 4 admins, all of whom respond often within the hour!

  • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The opposite of power tripping would be negligence.

    The ban message is sloppy, and the time to take action was too long, but the actions (ban + removal of comm) were the right call. They probably need more admins, specially to cover hours that others can’t.

    • jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      SDF admins are paid through the non-profit. So are most in a similar way on larger instances.

  • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Let’s not pickup the pitchforks based on just the ban string. However I agree that the situation where the admins are absent is very suboptimal. They need to assign some people from their instance that are active and ready to respond.

    PS: The opposite would be “They deserved it”.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      not here for pitchforks, just want what’s best for all their users :)

    • jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I am more than willing to do this. I really love the culture we have on SDF. Problem is that they are sysadmins, not instance admins.

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Exactly. I’m primarily a sysadmin as well, but first of all I “dogfood” my own lemmy constantly, (i.e. I didn’t set it up just for others) and second first thing I did is onboard more admins to help.

  • redrum@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    What’s the problem with that reason? It’s better to ban the troll fast that to check and evaluate the (hundred) reports pending.

    Also, all my support to the sdf admins. I can’t understand all this pressing against the non bigger instances, they are doing free work for all of us.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Checking just one, or the user account itself, would be sufficient.