• inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Back when I worked as a designer, using work without paying for usage rights leads to exposure of being civilly sued for copyright violations.

    You’re wrong. Confidently wrong.

    • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      if you were sued civilly for copyright violations, that’s not plagiarism. That’s copyright infringement. plagiarism is something else.

        • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          if I plagiarize The Bible, that has nothing to do with copyright. it’s still plagiarism.

          • inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            The Bible is well past the copyright period which IIRC is 70 years in America. The Bible is free use at this point. No different than the original Mickey Mouse which is also out of copyright protection. Or the Mona Lisa.

            The fact that you reference the Bible of all books shows how unbelievably confidently incorrect you are. Are you chatgpt?

            • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              you don’t seem to know what plagiarism is, so I don’t see the point in continuing this conversation.